Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierUnité de Recherche Oenologie [Villenave d'Ornon] [OENO]
dc.contributor.authorTHIBON, Cécile
hal.structure.identifierUnité de Recherche Oenologie [Villenave d'Ornon] [OENO]
dc.contributor.authorPONS, Alexandre
hal.structure.identifierUnité de Recherche Oenologie [Villenave d'Ornon] [OENO]
dc.contributor.authorMOUAKKA, Nadia
hal.structure.identifierUnité de Recherche Oenologie [Villenave d'Ornon] [OENO]
dc.contributor.authorREDON, Pascaline
dc.contributor.authorMÉREAU, Raphaël
hal.structure.identifierUnité de Recherche Oenologie [Villenave d'Ornon] [OENO]
dc.contributor.authorDARRIET, Philippe
IDREF: 077788834
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-29T14:01:05Z
dc.date.available2021-03-29T14:01:05Z
dc.date.issued2015-08-21
dc.identifier.issn0021-9673en_US
dc.identifier.urioai:crossref.org:10.1016/j.chroma.2015.08.027
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/26818
dc.description.abstractEnA rapid, sensitive method for assaying volatile impact compounds in white wine was developed using gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (GC–MS/MS) technology, with a triple quadrupole analyzer operating in chemical ionization and electron impact mode. This GC–MS/MS method made it possible to assay volatile thiols (3SH: 3-sulfanylhexanol, formerly 3MH; 3SHA: 3-sulfanylhexyl acetate, formerly 3MHA; 4MSP: 4-methyl-4-sulfanylpentan-2-one, formerly 4MMP; BM: benzenemethanethiol; E2SA: ethyl 2-sulfanylacetate; and 2FM: 2-furanmethanethiol) and odoriferous oxidation markers (Sotolon: 4,5-dimethyl-3-hydroxy-2(5)H-furanone, methional, and phenylacetaldehyde) simultaneously in dry white wines, comparing electron impact (EI) and chemical ionization (CI) modes. More molecular ions were produced by CI than protonated molecules, despite the greater fragmentation caused by EI. So, even using the best reactant gas giving the highest signal for thiols, EI was the best ionization mode, with the lowest detection limits. For all compounds of interest, the limits of quantification (LOQ) obtained were well below their detection thresholds (ranging from 0.5 to 8.5 ng/L for volatile thiols and 65–260 ng/L for oxidation markers). Recovery rates ranged from 86% to 111%, reproducibility (in terms of relative standard deviation; RSD) was below 18% in all cases, with correlation coefficients above 0.991 for all analytes. The method was successfully applied to the analysis of compounds of interest in Sauvignon Blanc wines from a single estate and ten different vintages.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.sourcecrossref
dc.subject.enwhite wine
dc.subject.envolatile thiols
dc.subject.enaldehyde
dc.subject.enoff flavor
dc.subject.enchemical ionization
dc.subject.enGC–MS/MS
dc.title.enComparison of electron and chemical ionization modes for the quantification of thiols and oxidative compounds in white wines by gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.chroma.2015.08.027en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Biologie végétaleen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed26358562en_US
bordeaux.journalJournal of Chromatography Aen_US
bordeaux.page123-133en_US
bordeaux.volume1415en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesOenologie - EA 4577en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionBordeaux INPen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
bordeaux.import.sourcedissemin
hal.exportfalse
workflow.import.sourcedissemin
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Chromatography%20A&rft.date=2015-08-21&rft.volume=1415&rft.spage=123-133&rft.epage=123-133&rft.eissn=0021-9673&rft.issn=0021-9673&rft.au=THIBON,%20C%C3%A9cile&PONS,%20Alexandre&MOUAKKA,%20Nadia&REDON,%20Pascaline&M%C3%89REAU,%20Rapha%C3%ABl&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée