The system will be going down for regular maintenance. Please save your work and logout.
Metadata
Show full item recordShare this item!
Effect of abrocitinib and dupilumab on eosinophil levels in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis
SENESCHAL, Julien
Immunology from Concept and Experiments to Translation = Immunologie Conceptuelle, Expérimentale et Translationnelle [ImmunoConcept]
< Reduce
Immunology from Concept and Experiments to Translation = Immunologie Conceptuelle, Expérimentale et Translationnelle [ImmunoConcept]
Language
EN
Article de revue
This item was published in
JEADV Clinical Practice. 2023, vol. 2, n° 3, p. 518-530
English Abstract
Background: Eosinophilia is common in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). Abrocitinib, an oral Janus kinase-1 inhibitor and dupilumab, an anti–interleukin-4 receptor-α antibody, are approved for moderate-to-severe AD. ...Read more >
Background: Eosinophilia is common in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). Abrocitinib, an oral Janus kinase-1 inhibitor and dupilumab, an anti–interleukin-4 receptor-α antibody, are approved for moderate-to-severe AD. Dupilumab has been associated with transient eosinophilia. Objectives: To assess the effect of abrocitinib and dupilumab on eosinophils in patients from the phase 3 JADE COMPARE (NCT03720470) and JADE EXTEND (NCT03422822) trials. Methods: In JADE COMPARE, patients received once-daily oral abrocitinib (200/100 mg), placebo or subcutaneous dupilumab (300 mg, biweekly) with background topical therapy. In the ongoing long-term JADE EXTEND study (Data cutoff: April 22, 2020), dupilumab-treated patients from JADE COMPARE received once-daily abrocitinib (200/100 mg) with background topical therapy. The proportion of patients with eosinophilia and hypereosinophilia, and association of eosinophilia with clinical efficacy was assessed. Adverse events (AEs) were also assessed. Results: Of the 837 patients in JADE COMPARE, 58 (25.7%), 47 (19.7%) and 51 (21.1%) had eosinophilia at baseline in the abrocitinib 200 mg, abrocitinib 100 mg and dupilumab groups, respectively. At Week 16, eosinophilia decreased with abrocitinib 200 mg (9.3%) and abrocitinib 100 mg (19.0%) but not dupilumab (21.5%); no cases of hypereosinophilia were observed with abrocitinib 200 mg compared with abrocitinib 100 mg (1.9%) and dupilumab (2.3%). Decreases in median eosinophil counts were greater with abrocitinib 200 mg (difference, −100/mm3) and abrocitinib 100 mg (−70/mm3) than dupilumab (+25/mm3) or placebo (+30/mm3) at Week 16. Similar trends were observed in patients with comorbid asthma and allergic rhinitis. Eosinophilia decreased from baseline to Week 12 in dupilumab-treated patients who switched to abrocitinib in JADE EXTEND. Decreased eosinophil counts with abrocitinib correlated positively with improvements in AD severity, itch and sleep loss. No eosinophilia-associated AEs occurred. Conclusions: Abrocitinib decreased eosinophilia in patients with moderate-to-severe AD who had baseline eosinophilia. Resolution of eosinophilia was associated with abrocitinib clinical efficacy. © 2023 The Authors. JEADV Clinical Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.Read less <
English Keywords
Atopic dermatitis
Clinical trials
eosinophil disorders
Collections

