Canopy leaf area of a mature evergreen Eucalyptus woodland does not respond to elevated atmospheric [CO2] but tracks water availability
GIMENO, Teresa
Interactions Sol Plante Atmosphère [UMR ISPA]
Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment
See more >
Interactions Sol Plante Atmosphère [UMR ISPA]
Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment
GIMENO, Teresa
Interactions Sol Plante Atmosphère [UMR ISPA]
Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment
< Reduce
Interactions Sol Plante Atmosphère [UMR ISPA]
Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment
Language
en
Article de revue
This item was published in
Global Change Biology. 2016, vol. 22, n° 4, p. 1666-1676
Wiley
English Abstract
Canopy leaf area, quantified by the leaf area index (L), is a crucial driver of forest productivity, water use and energy balance. Because L responds to environmental drivers, it can represent an important feedback to ...Read more >
Canopy leaf area, quantified by the leaf area index (L), is a crucial driver of forest productivity, water use and energy balance. Because L responds to environmental drivers, it can represent an important feedback to climate change, but its responses to rising atmospheric [CO2] and water availability of forests have been poorly quantified. We studied canopy leaf area dynamics for 28 months in a native evergreen Eucalyptus woodland exposed to free-air CO2 enrichment (the EucFACE experiment), in a subtropical climate where water limitation is common. We hypothesized that, because of expected stimulation of productivity and water-use efficiency, L should increase with elevated [CO2]. We estimated L from diffuse canopy transmittance, and measured monthly leaf litter production. Contrary to expectation, L did not respond to elevated [CO2]. We found that L varied between 1.10 and 2.20 across the study period. The dynamics of L showed a quick increase after heavy rainfall and a steady decrease during periods of low rainfall. Leaf litter production was correlated to changes in L, both during periods of decreasing L (when no leaf growth occurred) and during periods of increasing L (active shedding of old foliage when new leaf growth occurred). Leaf lifespan, estimated from mean L and total annual litter production, was up to 2 months longer under elevated [CO2] (1.18 vs. 1.01 years; P = 0.05). Our main finding that L was not responsive to elevated CO2 is consistent with other forest FACE studies, but contrasts with the positive response of L commonly predicted by many ecosystem models.Read less <
Keywords
phenology
English Keywords
drought
free-air CO2 enrichment
leaf area index
litter production
Origin
Hal imported