Effect estimates in randomized trials and observational studies: comparing apples with apples
dc.rights.license | open | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | LODI, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | PHILLIPS, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | LUNDGREN, J. | |
dc.contributor.author | LOGAN, R. | |
dc.contributor.author | SHARMA, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | COLE, S. R. | |
dc.contributor.author | BABIKER, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | LAW, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | CHU, H. | |
dc.contributor.author | BYRNE, D. | |
dc.contributor.author | HORBAN, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | STERNE, J. A. C. | |
dc.contributor.author | PORTER, K. | |
dc.contributor.author | SABIN, C. | |
dc.contributor.author | COSTAGLIOLA, D. | |
dc.contributor.author | ABGRALL, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | GILL, J. | |
dc.contributor.author | TOULOUMI, G. | |
dc.contributor.author | PACHECO, A. G. | |
dc.contributor.author | VAN SIGHEM, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | REISS, P. | |
dc.contributor.author | BUCHER, H. C. | |
dc.contributor.author | MONTOLIU GIMENEZ, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | JARRIN, I. | |
hal.structure.identifier | Bordeaux population health [BPH] | |
dc.contributor.author | WITTKOP, Linda | |
dc.contributor.author | MEYER, L. | |
dc.contributor.author | PEREZ-HOYOS, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | JUSTICE, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | NEATON, J. D. | |
dc.contributor.author | HERNAN, M. A. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-26T07:34:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-06-26T07:34:41Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-08-01 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1476-6256 (Electronic) 0002-9262 (Linking) | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/8206 | |
dc.description.abstractEn | Effect estimates from randomized trials and observational studies may not be directly comparable because of differences in study design, other than randomization, and in data analysis. We propose a three-step procedure to facilitate meaningful comparisons of effect estimates from randomized trials and observational studies: 1) harmonization of the study protocol (eligibility criteria, treatment strategies, outcome, start and end of follow-up, causal contrast) so that the studies target the same causal effect, 2) harmonization of the data analysis to estimate the causal effect, and 3) sensitivity analyses to investigate the impact of discrepancies that could not be accounted for in the harmonization process. To illustrate our approach, we compared estimates of the effect of immediate with deferred initiation of antiretroviral therapy in individuals positive to the human immunodeficiency virus from the START randomized trial and the observational HIV-CAUSAL Collaboration. | |
dc.language.iso | EN | en_US |
dc.subject.en | MORPH3Eus | |
dc.title.en | Effect estimates in randomized trials and observational studies: comparing apples with apples | |
dc.title.alternative | Am J Epidemiol | en_US |
dc.type | Article de revue | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/aje/kwz100 | en_US |
dc.subject.hal | Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie | en_US |
dc.identifier.pubmed | 31063192 | en_US |
bordeaux.journal | American journal of epidemiology | en_US |
bordeaux.page | 1569-1577 | en_US |
bordeaux.volume | 188 | en_US |
bordeaux.hal.laboratories | Bordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219 | en_US |
bordeaux.issue | 8 | en_US |
bordeaux.institution | Université de Bordeaux | en_US |
bordeaux.peerReviewed | oui | en_US |
bordeaux.inpress | non | en_US |
hal.export | false | |
bordeaux.COinS | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20epidemiology&rft.date=2019-08-01&rft.volume=188&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1569-1577&rft.epage=1569-1577&rft.eissn=1476-6256%20(Electronic)%200002-9262%20(Linking)&rft.issn=1476-6256%20(Electronic)%200002-9262%20(Linking)&rft.au=LODI,%20S.&PHILLIPS,%20A.&LUNDGREN,%20J.&LOGAN,%20R.&SHARMA,%20S.&rft.genre=article |
Files in this item
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
There are no files associated with this item. |