Effect estimates in randomized trials and observational studies: comparing apples with apples
Idioma
EN
Article de revue
Este ítem está publicado en
American journal of epidemiology. 2019-08-01, vol. 188, n° 8, p. 1569-1577
Resumen en inglés
Effect estimates from randomized trials and observational studies may not be directly comparable because of differences in study design, other than randomization, and in data analysis. We propose a three-step procedure to ...Leer más >
Effect estimates from randomized trials and observational studies may not be directly comparable because of differences in study design, other than randomization, and in data analysis. We propose a three-step procedure to facilitate meaningful comparisons of effect estimates from randomized trials and observational studies: 1) harmonization of the study protocol (eligibility criteria, treatment strategies, outcome, start and end of follow-up, causal contrast) so that the studies target the same causal effect, 2) harmonization of the data analysis to estimate the causal effect, and 3) sensitivity analyses to investigate the impact of discrepancies that could not be accounted for in the harmonization process. To illustrate our approach, we compared estimates of the effect of immediate with deferred initiation of antiretroviral therapy in individuals positive to the human immunodeficiency virus from the START randomized trial and the observational HIV-CAUSAL Collaboration.< Leer menos
Palabras clave en inglés
MORPH3Eus
Centros de investigación