Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire Cultures, Éducation, Sociétés [LACES]
dc.contributor.authorROUSSEL, Stephanie
dc.contributor.authorGRUSON, Brigitte
hal.structure.identifierInstitut de Recherche en Gestion des Organisations [IRGO]
dc.contributor.authorGALAN, Jean-Philippe
IDREF: 076643719
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-31T12:29:25Z
dc.date.available2021-05-31T12:29:25Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-02
dc.identifier.issn1090-4018en_US
dc.identifier.urioai:crossref.org:10.1080/10904018.2017.1331133
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/78755
dc.description.abstractEnThis study investigates the impact of a high-level and a low-level process-based L2 comprehension training on L1 French students’ listening performances. These students (N = 108) of English, Spanish, and German came from five different classes. After a L2 comprehension pretest, the participants were divided into two experimental groups. During the experimental phase, the two groups listened to the same three documents in their respective L2. The first group undertook listening comprehension activities relying on low-level processes, while the second group undertook activities aiming at fostering their use of high-level processes. These second types of activities were based on the Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire (MALQ) (Vandergrift, Goh, Mareschal & Tafaghodatari, 2006). As hypothesized, less skilled listeners trained to automatize low-level processes, scored significantly higher on the comprehension posttest than on the pretest. However, the hypothesis that more skilled listeners trained to develop high-level listening processes, would score better on the posttest than on the pretest could not be verified. Nevertheless, we observed some tendencies showing that more skilled learners had drawn some benefits from the training. In our conclusion, we argue that the impact of a high-level and a low-level process-based L2 comprehension training strongly depends on learners’ initial levels.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.sourcecrossref
dc.subject.enSecond Language Learning
dc.subject.enListening Comprehension
dc.subject.enTeaching Methods
dc.title.enWhat Types of Training Improve Learners’ Performances in Second Language Listening Comprehension?
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10904018.2017.1331133en_US
dc.subject.halSciences de l'Homme et Société/Educationen_US
bordeaux.journalInternational Journal of Listeningen_US
bordeaux.page39-52en_US
bordeaux.volume33en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesIRGO (Institut de Recherche en Gestion des Organisations) - EA 4190en_US
bordeaux.issue1en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.teamMarketing
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
bordeaux.import.sourcedissemin
hal.exportfalse
workflow.import.sourcedissemin
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=International%20Journal%20of%20Listening&rft.date=2019-01-02&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=39-52&rft.epage=39-52&rft.eissn=1090-4018&rft.issn=1090-4018&rft.au=ROUSSEL,%20Stephanie&GRUSON,%20Brigitte&GALAN,%20Jean-Philippe&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée