SHEARMUR, R.; CARRINCAZEAUX, Christophe; DOLOREUX, D.

doi:10.4337/9781784710774

Métadonnées

Afficher la notice complète

Licence d’utilisation du document

SHEARMUR, R.

CARRINCAZEAUX, Christophe

Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée [GREThA]

DOLOREUX, D.

Langue

Chapitre d'ouvrage

Ce document a été publié dans

Handbook on the Geographies of Innovation. 2016p. 1-16

Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

Résumé en anglais

Many key ideas and concepts that underpin our understanding of the geography of innovation were developed in the 1980s and early 1990s. They have in common their reference to a world of limited mobility and expensive communications. Furthermore, they were developed without fully theorizing geography: it is the innovation process and firm behaviour that have been theorized, leaving geographical concepts relatively unexplored. In the chapter the authors outline some of the limits of the current way that the geography of innovation is understood. First, they argue that geography should not be approached as a canvas upon which innovation occurs, but needs to be problematized and theorized. Second, we argue that there are ambiguities – or confusions – in the object and purpose of research: if the reasons for studying the geography of innovation were better articulated, and if the type of innovative process being examined were clarified, many apparently irreconcilable observations and ideas would be found to be complementary. Finally, the authors highlight the contextuality of geographic thought and concepts: each researcher brings to the table his or her own cultural biases and beliefs, and these colour the emphasis put on particular aspects of the interconnection between space and innovation.< Réduire

Métadonnées

Partager cette publication !

Licence d’utilisation du document

The geographies of innovations: Beyond one-size-fits-all

Langue

Ce document a été publié dans

Résumé en anglais

URI

DOI

Unités de recherche