Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire de psychologie [LabPsy]
dc.contributor.authorSUBRA, Baptiste
ORCID: 0000-0002-2973-7853
IDREF: 13979252X
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire Inter-universitaire de Psychologie : Personnalité, Cognition, Changement Social [LIP-PC2S]
dc.contributor.authorMULLER, Dominique
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive [LAPSCO]
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire de psychologie [LabPsy]
dc.contributor.authorFOURGASSIE, Lisa
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire de Psychologie et NeuroCognition [LPNC]
dc.contributor.authorCHAUVIN, Alan
hal.structure.identifierCentre de recherches sur la cognition et l'apprentissage [UMR 7295] [CeRCA [Poitiers, Tours]]
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire de psychologie [LabPsy]
dc.contributor.authorALEXOPOULOS, Theodore
ORCID: 0000-0001-8281-6449
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-29T16:46:13Z
dc.date.available2024-11-29T16:46:13Z
dc.date.issued2017-02-03
dc.identifier.issn0269-9931en_US
dc.identifier.urioai:crossref.org:10.1080/02699931.2017.1284044
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/203569
dc.description.abstractEnPrevious studies suggest that ancient (i.e. evolutionary-based) threats capture attention because human beings possess an inborn module shaped by evolution and dedicated to their detection. An alternative account proposes that a key feature predicting whether a stimulus will capture attention is its relevance rather than its ontology (i.e. phylogenetic or ontogenetic threat). Within this framework, the present research deals with the attentional capture by threats commonly encountered in our urban environment. In two experiments, we investigate the attentional capture by modern threats (i.e. weapons). In Experiment 1, participants responded to a target preceded by a cue, which was a weapon or a non-threatening stimulus. We found a larger cuing effect (faster reaction times to valid vs. invalid trials) with weapons as compared with non-threatening cues. In Experiment 2, modern (e.g. weapons) and ancient threats (e.g. snakes) were pitted against one another as cues to determine which ones preferentially capture attention. Crucially, participants were faster to detect a target preceded by a modern as opposed to an ancient threat, providing initial evidence for a superiority of modern threat. Overall, the present findings appear more consistent with a relevance-based explanation rather than an evolutionary-based explanation of threat detection.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.sourcecrossref
dc.subject.enAttentional capture
dc.subject.enThreat
dc.subject.enRelevance
dc.title.enOf guns and snakes: testing a modern threat superiority effect
dc.title.alternativeCogn Emoten_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02699931.2017.1284044en_US
dc.subject.halSciences de l'Homme et Société/Psychologieen_US
bordeaux.journalCognition and Emotionen_US
bordeaux.page81-91en_US
bordeaux.volume32en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesLaboratoire de psychologie (LabPsy) - UR 4139en_US
bordeaux.issue1en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
bordeaux.import.sourcedissemin
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exportfalse
workflow.import.sourcedissemin
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Cognition%20and%20Emotion&rft.date=2017-02-03&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=81-91&rft.epage=81-91&rft.eissn=0269-9931&rft.issn=0269-9931&rft.au=SUBRA,%20Baptiste&MULLER,%20Dominique&FOURGASSIE,%20Lisa&CHAUVIN,%20Alan&ALEXOPOULOS,%20Theodore&rft.genre=article


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record