Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire de psychologie [LabPsy]
dc.contributor.authorFELIX, Simon
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire de psychologie [LabPsy]
dc.contributor.authorVALERY, Kevin-Marc
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire de psychologie [LabPsy]
dc.contributor.authorCAIADA, Meryl
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire de psychologie [LabPsy]
dc.contributor.authorGUIONNET, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorBONILLA-GUERRERO, Julien
dc.contributor.authorDESTAILLATS, Jean-Marc
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire de psychologie [LabPsy]
dc.contributor.authorPROUTEAU, Antoinette
ORCID: 0000-0001-7540-4139
IDREF: 083613544
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-19T11:32:59Z
dc.date.available2024-11-19T11:32:59Z
dc.date.issued2024-08-01
dc.identifier.issn1873-7811en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/203350
dc.description.abstractEnPersonal recovery represents a paradigm shift in mental healthcare. Validated self-report outcome measures (PROMs) are needed to facilitate the transformation towards recovery-oriented practices and services. Objectives were to identify published measures and analyze their measurement properties using a standardized methodology. Following the COSMIN guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of personal recovery PROMs in serious mental illness. The MEDLINE, PMC, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, PBSC and Scopus electronic databases were searched for articles published between May 2012 and February 2024. Full-text articles from a previous systematic review were also examined. 91 studies were included in the review, describing 25 PROMs. Ten of them had not been identified in previous reviews. Quality of evidence was globally poor for most PROM measurement properties. Very little evidence was found for cross-cultural validity, measurement invariance, measurement error and criterion validity. The Recovery Assessment Scale and Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery showed the strongest evidence for sufficient psychometric data on a wide range of measurement properties. Several personal recovery measures are now available. While research is still needed to enhance their validity on some psychometric properties, the current tools appear sufficient to cover most research and clinical needs.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subject.enPersonal recovery
dc.subject.enSerious mental illness
dc.subject.enPatient-reported outcome measures
dc.subject.enMeasurement properties
dc.subject.enPsychometrics
dc.subject.enSystematic review
dc.title.enPersonal recovery self-report outcome measures in serious mental illness: A systematic review of measurement properties
dc.title.alternativeClin Psychol Reven_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102459en_US
dc.subject.halSciences de l'Homme et Société/Psychologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed38943916en_US
bordeaux.journalClinical Psychology Reviewen_US
bordeaux.page102459en_US
bordeaux.volume112en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesLaboratoire de psychologie (LabPsy) - UR 4139en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
bordeaux.import.sourcepubmed
hal.identifierhal-04790689
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2024-11-19T11:33:01Z
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exporttrue
workflow.import.sourcepubmed
dc.rights.ccCC BYen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20Psychology%20Review&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=112&rft.spage=102459&rft.epage=102459&rft.eissn=1873-7811&rft.issn=1873-7811&rft.au=FELIX,%20Simon&VALERY,%20Kevin-Marc&CAIADA,%20Meryl&GUIONNET,%20Sarah&BONILLA-GUERRERO,%20Julien&rft.genre=article


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record