Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

The use of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) to assess cognitive impairment in Prader-Willi syndrome

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive [LAPSCO]
dc.contributor.authorCHEVALERE, Johann
hal.structure.identifierHôpital Marin d'Hendaye
dc.contributor.authorLAURIER, Virginie
hal.structure.identifierCentre de Référence du Syndrome de Prader-Willi [CHU Toulouse] [SPW-PRADORT]
dc.contributor.authorTAUBER, Maite
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire de psychologie [LabPsy]
dc.contributor.authorCAMBLATS, Anna-Malika
hal.structure.identifierHôpital Marin d'Hendaye
dc.contributor.authorTHUILLEAUX, Denise
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire de psychologie [LabPsy]
dc.contributor.authorPOSTAL, Virginie
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-11T08:23:46Z
dc.date.available2024-07-11T08:23:46Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-29
dc.identifier.issn2044-1282en_US
dc.identifier.urioai:crossref.org:10.1108/amhid-04-2020-0009
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/200842
dc.description.abstractEnPurpose When a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment cannot be carried out, a quick and discriminant tool of good psychometric properties can be useful to practitioners. The purpose of this paper is to examine the use of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in patients with Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) and to test its reliability for cognitive assessment in a population with intellectual disabilities. Design/methodology/approach Thirty-seven adults with PWS took the MoCA. Reliability of the battery was tested using Cronbach’s alphas. The performance of PWS adults in each subtest was then compared to that of a normative population of healthy adults. Findings The MoCA was found to be unreliable in PWS. The subtests analyses indicated that the PWS sample underperformed the normative population of healthy adults on most subtests of the MoCA. A sub-sample aged between 17and 29 years showed normal performance on Naming and Memory, and a sub-sample aged from 30 to 39 years showed similar performance on Language, Memory and Orientation relative to age-matched normative healthy adults. Research limitations/implications Results showed that the current version of the MoCA, if taken as a whole test for cognitive assessment, does not present with adequate psychometric properties, which the authors interpret as reflecting the heterogeneity in PWS cognitive profiles. If used in PWS, the MoCA may however be useful in examining cognitive functions separately using subtest-based comparisons to normative data. Originality/value This research contributes to a better assessment of cognitive profile in PWS and people with learning disabilities by arguing that the use of psychometric tests should depend more on the specificity of the population under evaluation.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.sourcecrossref
dc.subject.enPrader–Willi syndrome
dc.subject.enIntellectual disabilities
dc.subject.enMontreal cognitive assessment
dc.subject.enReliability analysis
dc.title.enThe use of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) to assess cognitive impairment in Prader-Willi syndrome
dc.title.alternativeAdv Ment Health Intellect Disabilen_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/amhid-04-2020-0009en_US
dc.subject.halSciences de l'Homme et Société/Psychologieen_US
bordeaux.journalAdvances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilitiesen_US
bordeaux.page273-285en_US
bordeaux.volume14en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesLaboratoire de psychologie (LabPsy) - UR 4139en_US
bordeaux.issue6en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
bordeaux.import.sourcedissemin
hal.identifierhal-04644587
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2024-07-11T08:23:47Z
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exporttrue
workflow.import.sourcedissemin
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20Mental%20Health%20and%20Intellectual%20Disabilities&rft.date=2020-09-29&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=273-285&rft.epage=273-285&rft.eissn=2044-1282&rft.issn=2044-1282&rft.au=CHEVALERE,%20Johann&LAURIER,%20Virginie&TAUBER,%20Maite&CAMBLATS,%20Anna-Malika&THUILLEAUX,%20Denise&rft.genre=article


Archivos en el ítem

ArchivosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay archivos asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem