Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierInstitut de Sciences Criminelles et de la Justice [ISCJ]
dc.contributor.authorLACAZE, Marion
IDREF: 13950446X
hal.structure.identifierInstitut François Gény [IFG]
dc.contributor.authorWALTHER, Julien
dc.contributor.authorPICOTTI, L.
dc.contributor.authorPANATTONI, B.
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-08T12:05:16Z
dc.date.available2024-07-08T12:05:16Z
dc.date.issued2023-08-25
dc.identifier.issn0223-5404en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/200777
dc.descriptionTitre du numéro : Traditional Criminal Law Categories and AI : Crisis or Palingenesis ?en_US
dc.description.abstractEnFrench criminal law lacks a definition of AI and French substantive law does not provide for AI having legal personality or capacity. French legal literature denies to this day the possibility of an independent accountability of AI. The analysis of classical figures of criminal Law (actus reus, mens rea and possible forms of punishment for AI) shows that the AI cannot be seen per se as a perpretator of an offence but rather as an instrument for committing an offence. The central role of human beings must therefore be emphasized: criminal liability due to AI could accordingly be considered in the context of a specific mechanism of attribution to natural or legal persons in relation to AI. This leads to the reflexion on the theoretical basis for accountability of AI. Specific laws regarding vehicles with delegated control regulated for the first time the interaction between man and AI in French substantive law and provided a first practical example. The field of compliance is also of great interest in organising how to anticipate the criminal risks related to AI activity through the classical tools of compliance (risk-mapping, code of conduct, detailing the various safety and transparency obligations for designers/manufacturers, regulation through dedicated authorities)
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.titleFrench Report on Traditional Criminal Law Categories and AI
dc.title.alternativeRIDPen_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.subject.halSciences de l'Homme et Société/Droiten_US
bordeaux.journalRevue internationale de droit pénal = International review of penal law = Revista internacional de derecho penalen_US
bordeaux.page153-194en_US
bordeaux.volume94en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesInstitut de Sciences Criminelles et de la Justice (ISCJ) - UR 4633en_US
bordeaux.issue1en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-04638606
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2024-07-08T12:05:18Z
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exporttrue
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.title=French%20Report%20on%20Traditional%20Criminal%20Law%20Categories%20and%20AI&rft.atitle=French%20Report%20on%20Traditional%20Criminal%20Law%20Categories%20and%20AI&rft.jtitle=Revue%20internationale%20de%20droit%20p%C3%A9nal%20=%20International%20review%20of%20penal%20law%20=%20Revista%20internacional%20de%20derecho%20penal&rft.date=2023-08-25&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=153-194&rft.epage=153-194&rft.eissn=0223-5404&rft.issn=0223-5404&rft.au=LACAZE,%20Marion&WALTHER,%20Julien&PICOTTI,%20L.&PANATTONI,%20B.&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée