WISZ, M. S.; BROENNIMANN, O.; GRØNKJÆR, P.; MØLLER, P. D. R.; OLSEN, S. M.; SWINGEDOUW, Didier; HEDEHOLM, R. B.; NIELSEN, E. E.; GUISAN, A.; PELLISSIER, L.

doi:10.1038/nclimate2762

Métadonnées

Afficher la notice complète

Licence d’utilisation du document

Langue

Article de revue

Ce document a été publié dans

Nature Climate Change. 2015-08-21, vol. 5, n° 9, p. 790-791

Résumé en anglais

Ingvaldsen et al.1 comment on our study assessing global fish interchanges between the North Atlantic and Pacific oceans for more than 500 species during the entire twenty-first century2. They propose that discrepancies between our model projections and observed data for cod in the Barents Sea are the result of the choice of atmosphere–ocean general circulation models (AOGCMs). We address this assertion here, re-running the cod model with additional observation data from the Barents Sea1,3, and show that the lack of open-access archived data for the Barents Sea was the primary cause of local prediction mismatch. This finding highlights the importance of systematic deposit of biodiversity data in global databases.< Réduire

Métadonnées

Partager cette publication !

Licence d’utilisation du document

Reply to 'Sources of uncertainties in cod distribution models'

Langue

Ce document a été publié dans

Résumé en anglais

URI

DOI

Unités de recherche