Controlled degradation of polyisoprene and polybutadiene: A comparative study of two methods
BERTO, Pierre
Team 1 LCPO : Polymerization Catalyses & Engineering
Team 2 LCPO : Biopolymers & Bio-sourced Polymers
Team 1 LCPO : Polymerization Catalyses & Engineering
Team 2 LCPO : Biopolymers & Bio-sourced Polymers
BERTO, Pierre
Team 1 LCPO : Polymerization Catalyses & Engineering
Team 2 LCPO : Biopolymers & Bio-sourced Polymers
< Réduire
Team 1 LCPO : Polymerization Catalyses & Engineering
Team 2 LCPO : Biopolymers & Bio-sourced Polymers
Langue
en
Article de revue
Ce document a été publié dans
Polymer Degradation and Stability. 2018, vol. 154, p. 295 - 303
Elsevier
Résumé en anglais
Low molar mass carbonyl telechelic cis,1-4 polyisoprene (CTPI) and aldehyde telechelic cis,1-4 polybutadiene (ATPB) were easily prepared by the controlled degradation of high molar mass 1,4-cis polyisoprene (PI) and 1,4-cis ...Lire la suite >
Low molar mass carbonyl telechelic cis,1-4 polyisoprene (CTPI) and aldehyde telechelic cis,1-4 polybutadiene (ATPB) were easily prepared by the controlled degradation of high molar mass 1,4-cis polyisoprene (PI) and 1,4-cis polybutadiene (PB) in a molar mass range of 5 000-80 000 g.mol-1. Two methods are compared: the direct one using only the periodic acid (H5IO6) to randomly cleave the chain and a second one where the chain are first epoxidized before being cleaved by the periodic acid. In both cases, a control of the final chain length was observed with nevertheless a better control of the final chain length, dispersity and chain-ends using the 2-steps procedure. Importance of the washing step in order to avoid side reactions on the carbonyl chain-ends is also discussed. 2< Réduire
Mots clés en anglais
Polybutadiene
Polyisoprene
controlled degradation
epoxidation
periodic acid
mCPBA
Origine
Importé de halUnités de recherche