Quantification of ecohydrological sensitivities and their influencing factors at the seasonal scale
HOU, Yiping
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China [Chengdu] [UESTC]
University of British Columbia [Canada] [UBC]
Leer más >
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China [Chengdu] [UESTC]
University of British Columbia [Canada] [UBC]
HOU, Yiping
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China [Chengdu] [UESTC]
University of British Columbia [Canada] [UBC]
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China [Chengdu] [UESTC]
University of British Columbia [Canada] [UBC]
LIU, Xiangzhuo
Interactions Sol Plante Atmosphère [UMR ISPA]
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China [Chengdu] [UESTC]
< Leer menos
Interactions Sol Plante Atmosphère [UMR ISPA]
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China [Chengdu] [UESTC]
Idioma
en
Article de revue
Este ítem está publicado en
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 2021, vol. 25, n° 3, p. 1447-1466
European Geosciences Union
Resumen en inglés
Ecohydrological sensitivity, defined as the response intensity of streamflow to per unit vegetation change is an integrated indicator for assessing hydrological sensitivity to vegetation change. Understanding ecohydrological ...Leer más >
Ecohydrological sensitivity, defined as the response intensity of streamflow to per unit vegetation change is an integrated indicator for assessing hydrological sensitivity to vegetation change. Understanding ecohydrological sensitivity and its influencing factors is crucial for managing water supply, reducing water-related hazards and ensuring aquatic functions by vegetation management. Yet, there is still a systematic assessment on ecohydrological sensitivity and associated driving factors especially at a seasonal scale lacking. In this study, 14 large watersheds across various environmental gradients in China were selected to quantify their ecohydrological sensitivities at a seasonal scale and to examine the role of associated influencing factors such as climate, vegetation, topography, soil and landscape. Based on the variables identified by correlation analysis and factor analysis, prediction models of seasonal ecohydrological sensitivity were constructed to test their utilities for the design of watershed management and protection strategies. Our key findings were the following: (1) ecohydrological sensitivities were more sensitive under dry conditions than wet conditions – for example, 1 % LAI (leaf area index) change, on average, induced 5.05 % and 1.96 % change in the dry and wet season streamflow, respectively; (2) seasonal ecohydrological sensitivities were highly variable across the study watersheds with different climate conditions, dominant soil types and hydrological regimes; and (3) the dry season ecohydrological sensitivity was mostly determined by topography (slope, slope length, valley depth and downslope distance gradient), soil (topsoil organic carbon and topsoil bulk density) and vegetation (LAI), while the wet season ecohydrological sensitivity was mainly controlled by soil (topsoil-available water-holding capacity), landscape (edge density) and vegetation (leaf area index). Our study provided a useful and practical framework to assess and predict ecohydrological sensitivities at the seasonal scale. The established ecohydrological sensitivity prediction models can be applied to ungauged watersheds or watersheds with limited hydrological data to help decision makers and watershed managers effectively manage hydrological impacts through vegetation restoration programs. We conclude that ecohydrological sensitivities at the seasonal scale are varied by climate, vegetation and watershed property, and their understanding can greatly support the management of hydrological risks and protection of aquatic functions.< Leer menos
Orígen
Importado de HalCentros de investigación