STERZI, Valerio; MARONERO, Cecilia; ORSATTI, Gianluca; VEZZULLI, Andrea

doi:10.1093/icc/dtae010

Métadonnées

Afficher la notice complète

Licence d’utilisation du document

STERZI, Valerio

Bordeaux Sciences Economiques [BSE]

MARONERO, Cecilia

Bordeaux Sciences Economiques [BSE]

ORSATTI, Gianluca

Langue

Article de revue

Ce document a été publié dans

Industrial and Corporate Change. 2024-03-21

Résumé en anglais

Abstract This paper delves into the proliferation of non-practicing entities (NPEs), a hot topic in academia and public policy, especially in the United States. The common belief is that Europe is less exposed to NPEs due to a robust patent system, higher enforcement costs, and smaller damage awards. Yet, using a new database of NPE patent applications at the European Patent Office (EPO), the study uncovers that NPEs activity in Europe is arising: they own nearly 20,000 EPO patents, primarily in Electrical Engineering. Moreover, we contribute the literature investigating the heterogeneity of the NPE business model and its relationship with the characteristics and use of the patents they target. Our econometric analysis provides threefold original evidence. First, NPEs with higher propensity for litigation (i.e., “Litigation” NPEs) acquire patents with higher infringement risk but similar technological quality than practicing entities. Second, patent aggregators (i.e., “Portfolio” NPEs) and technology companies (i.e., “Technology” NPEs) acquire higher-quality patents compared to those acquired by practicing entities. Third, patent acquisitions by “Litigation” NPEs and “Portfolio” NPEs reduce the subsequent use of protected technologies.< Réduire

Métadonnées

Partager cette publication !

Licence d’utilisation du document

Non-practicing entities in Europe: an empirical analysis of patent acquisitions at the European Patent Office

Langue

Ce document a été publié dans

Résumé en anglais

URI

DOI

Unités de recherche