Estimating the population effectiveness of interventions against COVID-19 in France: A modelling study
GANSER, Iris
Statistics In System biology and Translational Medicine [SISTM]
Bordeaux population health [BPH]
Voir plus >
Statistics In System biology and Translational Medicine [SISTM]
Bordeaux population health [BPH]
GANSER, Iris
Statistics In System biology and Translational Medicine [SISTM]
Bordeaux population health [BPH]
Statistics In System biology and Translational Medicine [SISTM]
Bordeaux population health [BPH]
PRAGUE, Melanie
Statistics In System biology and Translational Medicine [SISTM]
Bordeaux population health [BPH]
Statistics In System biology and Translational Medicine [SISTM]
Bordeaux population health [BPH]
THIEBAUT, Rodolphe
Statistics In System biology and Translational Medicine [SISTM]
Bordeaux population health [BPH]
< Réduire
Statistics In System biology and Translational Medicine [SISTM]
Bordeaux population health [BPH]
Langue
EN
Article de revue
Ce document a été publié dans
Epidemics. 2024-03-01, vol. 46, p. 100744
Résumé en anglais
BACKGROUND: Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) and vaccines have been widely used to manage the COVID-19 pandemic. However, uncertainty persists regarding the effectiveness of these interventions due to data quality ...Lire la suite >
BACKGROUND: Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) and vaccines have been widely used to manage the COVID-19 pandemic. However, uncertainty persists regarding the effectiveness of these interventions due to data quality issues, methodological challenges, and differing contextual factors. Accurate estimation of their effects is crucial for future epidemic preparedness. METHODS: To address this, we developed a population-based mechanistic model that includes the impact of NPIs and vaccines on SARS-CoV-2 transmission and hospitalization rates. Our statistical approach estimated all parameters in one step, accurately propagating uncertainty. We fitted the model to comprehensive epidemiological data in France from March 2020 to October 2021. With the same model, we simulated scenarios of vaccine rollout. RESULTS: The first lockdown was the most effective, reducing transmission by 84 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 83-85). Subsequent lockdowns had diminished effectiveness (reduction of 74 % (69-77) and 11 % (9-18), respectively). A 6 pm curfew was more effective than one at 8 pm (68 % (66-69) vs. 48 % (45-49) reduction), while school closures reduced transmission by 15 % (12-18). In a scenario without vaccines before November 2021, we predicted 159,000 or 168 % (95 % prediction interval (PI) 70-315) more deaths and 1,488,000 or 300 % (133-492) more hospitalizations. If a vaccine had been available after 100 days, over 71,000 deaths (16,507-204,249) and 384,000 (88,579-1,020,386) hospitalizations could have been averted. CONCLUSION: Our results highlight the substantial impact of NPIs, including lockdowns and curfews, in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. We also demonstrate the value of the 100 days objective of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) initiative for vaccine availability.< Réduire
Mots clés en anglais
COVID-19
Dynamics
Epidemics
Mathematical model
Non-pharmaceutical interventions
SARS-CoV2
Vaccines
Project ANR
Initiative for the creation of a Vaccine Research Institute - ANR-10-LABX-0077
Unités de recherche