Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemCompartir este ítem
Speciation of organic fractions does matter for aerosol source apportionment. Part 3: Combining off-line and on-line measurements
ZHANG, Y.
Institut National de l'Environnement Industriel et des Risques [INERIS]
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement [Gif-sur-Yvette] [LSCE]
Institut National de l'Environnement Industriel et des Risques [INERIS]
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement [Gif-sur-Yvette] [LSCE]
HOPKE, P.K.
Center for Air Resources Engineering and Science, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY, USA
Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
< Leer menos
Center for Air Resources Engineering and Science, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY, USA
Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
Idioma
EN
Article de revue
Este ítem está publicado en
Science of the Total Environment. 2019-11, vol. 690, p. 944-955
Resumen en inglés
he present study proposes an advanced methodology to refine the source apportionment of organic aerosol (OA). This methodology is based on the combination of offline and online datasets in a single Positive Matrix Factorization ...Leer más >
he present study proposes an advanced methodology to refine the source apportionment of organic aerosol (OA). This methodology is based on the combination of offline and online datasets in a single Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) analysis using the multilinear engine (ME-2) algorithm and a customized time synchronization procedure. It has been applied to data from measurements conducted in the Paris region (France) during a PM pollution event in March 2015. Measurements included OA ACSM (Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor) mass spectra and specific primary and secondary organic molecular markers from PM10 filters on their original time resolution (30 min for ACSM and 4 h for PM10 filters). Comparison with the conventional PMF analysis of the ACSM OA dataset (PMF-ACSM) showed very good agreement for the discrimination between primary and secondary OA fractions with about 75% of the OA mass of secondary origin. Furthermore, the use of the combined datasets allowed the deconvolution of 3 primary OA (POA) factors and 7 secondary OA (SOA) factors. A clear identification of the source/origin of 54% of the total SOA mass could be achieved thanks to specific molecular markers. Specifically, 28% of that fraction was linked to combustion sources (biomass burning and traffic emissions). A clear identification of primary traffic OA was also obtained using the PMF-combined analysis while PMF-ACSM only gave a proxy for this OA source in the form of total hydrocarbon-like OA (HOA) mass concentrations. In addition, the primary biomass burning-related OA source was explained by two OA factors, BBOA and OPOA-like BBOA. This new approach has showed undeniable advantages over the conventional approaches by providing valuable insights into the processes involved in SOA formation and their sources. However, the origins of highly oxidized SOA could not be fully identified due to the lack of specific molecular markers for such aged SOA.< Leer menos
Palabras clave en inglés
GEOF
Aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ACSM)
Molecular markers
Particulate matter (PM)
Secondary organic aerosol (SOA)
Source apportionment
Time synchronization
Proyecto europeo
Aerosols, Clouds, and Trace gases Research InfraStructure
Centros de investigación