Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierUnité de Recherche Œnologie [Villenave d'Ornon] [OENO]
dc.contributor.authorCAISSIE, Andre F.
hal.structure.identifierUnité de Recherche Œnologie [Villenave d'Ornon] [OENO]
dc.contributor.authorRIQUIER, Laurent
hal.structure.identifierUnité de Recherche Œnologie [Villenave d'Ornon] [OENO]
dc.contributor.authorDE REVEL, Gilles
hal.structure.identifierUnité de Recherche Œnologie [Villenave d'Ornon] [OENO]
dc.contributor.authorTEMPERE, Sophie
IDREF: 154752258
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-13T09:53:45Z
dc.date.available2024-02-13T09:53:45Z
dc.date.issued2023-12
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/188080
dc.description.abstractEnThe definition of the term "organoleptic quality" in sensory evaluation of food products does not seem to be consensual. Descriptive or liking methods are generally used to differentiate between wines. Nevertheless, quality evaluation of a product such as wine is defined as an integrated impression, like acceptability, pleasure, aesthetic or emotional experiences during tasting. According to the 'modality appropriateness' hypothesis which predicts that wine tasters weigh the most suitable sensory inputs for a specific assessment, the nature of the quality dimensions may modulate sensory influences. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether the dominant senses during wine assessment depend on the wine quality dimension being evaluated: emotional and aesthetic approaches, assessment of the exemplarity to a PDO, or liking. Expert wine tasters assessed these questions on twenty wines repeatedly, under different tasting conditions: global (all senses), unimodal (visual, smell and taste), and combined senses (visual/smell, visual/in-mouth sensations and olfaction/in-mouth sensations). Psychometric index and regression models suggested a dominance of smell in emotional, and aesthetic assessments, and of visual dominance for exemplarity decisions. Liking is a more plural composite model of wine assessment. As these different dimensions do not share the same multisensory integration processes, quality assessments require a more holistic and multidimensional approach.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.title.enSensory dominances depend on the wine quality dimension
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
bordeaux.journalFood Quality and Preferenceen_US
bordeaux.volume112en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesUnité de Recherche Œnologie [Villenave d'Ornon] [OENO]en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionBordeaux INPen_US
bordeaux.institutionINRAEen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exportfalse
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Food%20Quality%20and%20Preference&rft.date=2023-12&rft.volume=112&rft.au=CAISSIE,%20Andre%20F.&RIQUIER,%20Laurent&DE%20REVEL,%20Gilles&TEMPERE,%20Sophie&rft.genre=article


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record