Crystal Plasticity simulations of in situ tensile tests: A two-step inverse method for identification of CP parameters, and assessment of CPFEM capabilities
BARRALLIER, L.
Mécanique des Surfaces (EA4496) [MECASURF]
Mechanics surfaces and materials processing [MSMP]
Arts et Métiers Paristech ENSAM Aix-en-Provence
Arts et Métiers ParisTech
Mécanique des Surfaces (EA4496) [MECASURF]
Mechanics surfaces and materials processing [MSMP]
Arts et Métiers Paristech ENSAM Aix-en-Provence
Arts et Métiers ParisTech
BARRALLIER, L.
Mécanique des Surfaces (EA4496) [MECASURF]
Mechanics surfaces and materials processing [MSMP]
Arts et Métiers Paristech ENSAM Aix-en-Provence
Arts et Métiers ParisTech
< Réduire
Mécanique des Surfaces (EA4496) [MECASURF]
Mechanics surfaces and materials processing [MSMP]
Arts et Métiers Paristech ENSAM Aix-en-Provence
Arts et Métiers ParisTech
Langue
EN
Article de revue
Ce document a été publié dans
International Journal of Plasticity. 2023-09-01, vol. 168, p. 103695
Résumé en anglais
As the computational capability of modern computers increases, the Crystal Plasticity Finite Element Method (CPFEM) becomes more and more popular in materials science to model the mechanical behaviour of polycrystals. ...Lire la suite >
As the computational capability of modern computers increases, the Crystal Plasticity Finite Element Method (CPFEM) becomes more and more popular in materials science to model the mechanical behaviour of polycrystals. Indeed, such analysis provides extensive information about local mechanical fields (such as plastic strain and stress), which can be useful for understanding the behaviour of bulk materials. However, estimating the parameters of the CP constitutive laws is still challenging because they are not directly related to the macroscopic behaviour of the polycrystalline aggregates. Thus, one way to identify such parameters is by inverse analysis from CPFEM simulations. However, such approach is usually extremely time consuming. This paper proposes a two-step optimization scheme to determine these coefficients. The first step is based on a simple model, similar to that proposed by Sachs back in 1928. The second step is based on CPFEM simulations, to be compared with experimental data acquired by an in situ tensile test and full-field measurements made by High-Resolution Digital Image Correlation (HRDIC). The uniqueness of the solution found by inverse analysis is studied and ways to solve the local minima issues are provided. Finally, the ability of CPFEM to replicate an in situ tensile test is assessed.< Réduire
Mots clés en anglais
DIC
In situ tensile test
EBSD
Crystal Plasticity
CPFEM
Unités de recherche