Anthropogenic versus non-anthropogenic bird bone assemblages: New criteria for their distinction
LAROULANDIE, Véronique
De la Préhistoire à l'Actuel : Culture, Environnement et Anthropologie [PACEA]
De la Préhistoire à l'Actuel : Culture, Environnement et Anthropologie [PACEA]
LAROULANDIE, Véronique
De la Préhistoire à l'Actuel : Culture, Environnement et Anthropologie [PACEA]
< Réduire
De la Préhistoire à l'Actuel : Culture, Environnement et Anthropologie [PACEA]
Langue
en
Communication dans un congrès avec actes
Ce document a été publié dans
Biosphere to Lithosphere, New studies in vertebrate taphonomy. Edited by T. O'Connor. Processings of the 9th Conference of the International Council of Archaeozoology, Durham 23-28 august 2002, Biosphere to Lithosphere, New studies in vertebrate taphonomy. Edited by T. O'Connor. Processings of the 9th Conference of the International Council of Archaeozoology, Durham 23-28 august 2002, 2005, Oxford. 2005 n° chapitre 3, p. 25-30
Oxbow Books
Résumé en anglais
Distinguishing cultural from non-cultural modifications is of crucial importance in any zooarchaeological study. As a contribution to this goal, this paper deals with human damage to bird bones, which is undocumented or ...Lire la suite >
Distinguishing cultural from non-cultural modifications is of crucial importance in any zooarchaeological study. As a contribution to this goal, this paper deals with human damage to bird bones, which is undocumented or poorly documented in the field of avian taphonomy. It provides detailed descriptions of peeling and squashing (which occur on the humerus during disarticulation of the elbow), using both modern and archaeological material. I also address the questions of under-representation of articular ends and human tooth marks on bone.< Réduire
Mots clés
préhistoire
taphonomy
oiseau
Mots clés en anglais
prehistory
bird bone taphonomy
Origine
Importé de halUnités de recherche