Two ways of defining sustainable mobility: Autolib' and BeMobility
Idioma
en
Article de revue
Este ítem está publicado en
Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. 2014-02-10, vol. 16, n° 1
Taylor & Francis (Routledge)
Resumen en inglés
European cities have emerged as laboratories for 'sustainable mobility'. In the last few years, they have supported numerous electric car projects which combine clean engine technologies with offers on public or shared ...Leer más >
European cities have emerged as laboratories for 'sustainable mobility'. In the last few years, they have supported numerous electric car projects which combine clean engine technologies with offers on public or shared mobility. This paper compares two ongoing public electric car services in Berlin (BeMobility) and Paris (Autolib'). We explain how both projects shape future visions of sustainable mobility and transform regional transport systems in specific ways through their performative impact as local transport policy tools. Focusing on the socio-economic and political processes through which both projects were conceived and put into practice, we explain their differences as they reflect participating actors' interests in a French versus German industrial and transport policy context after the economic crisis in 2008. We find that whereas BeMobility integrates electric cars as one element in Berlin's intermodal transport system, and thus is centred around 'intermodality' as the central vision of sustainable transport, Autolib' in Paris essentially reproduces the dominant mode of private passenger car transport through adding a shared electric car fleet.< Leer menos
Palabras clave en inglés
Autolib
Sustainable mobility
Autolib'
BeMobility
electric car
new transport system
intermodality
shared mobility
Orígen
Importado de HalCentros de investigación