BESANCON, Lonni; PEIFFER-SMADJA, Nathan; SEGALAS, Corentin; JIANG, Haiting; MASUZZO, Paola; SMOUT, Cooper; BILLY, Eric; DEFORET, Maxime; LEYRAT, Clemence

doi:10.1186/s12874-021-01304-y

Bordeaux population health [BPH]

Idioma

Article de revue

Este ítem está publicado en

BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2021, vol. 21, n° 1

Resumen en inglés

In the last decade Open Science principles have been successfully advocated for and are being slowly adopted in different research communities. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic many publishers and researchers have sped up their adoption of Open Science practices, sometimes embracing them fully and sometimes partially or in a sub-optimal manner. In this article, we express concerns about the violation of some of the Open Science principles and its potential impact on the quality of research output. We provide evidence of the misuses of these principles at different stages of the scientific process. We call for a wider adoption of Open Science practices in the hope that this work will encourage a broader endorsement of Open Science principles and serve as a reminder that science should always be a rigorous process, reliable and transparent, especially in the context of a pandemic where research findings are being translated into practice even more rapidly. We provide all data and scripts at https://osf.io/renxy/.< Leer menos

Palabras clave en inglés

COVID-19

Methodology

Open science

Peer review

URI

https://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/140247

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01304-y

Centros de investigación

Bordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219

Ver/Abrir

Metadatos

Compartir este ítem

Licencia de uso del documento

Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic

Idioma

Este ítem está publicado en

Resumen en inglés

Palabras clave en inglés

URI

DOI

Centros de investigación