Show simple item record

Estimating precipitation on early Mars using a radiative-convective model of the atmosphere and comparison with inferred runoff from geomorphology

hal.structure.identifierECLIPSE 2015
dc.contributor.authorVON PARIS, P.
dc.contributor.authorPETAU, A.,
hal.structure.identifierNottingham Transportation Engineering Centre
dc.contributor.authorGRENFELL, J. L.,
dc.contributor.authorHAUBER, E.,
hal.structure.identifierInstitut de Physique du Globe de Paris [IPGP]
dc.contributor.authorBREUER, D.,
hal.structure.identifierDLR Institute of Planetary Research
dc.contributor.authorJAUMANN, R.,
hal.structure.identifierDLR Institut für Planetenforschung
dc.contributor.authorRAUER, H.,
hal.structure.identifierDLR Institute of Planetary Research
dc.contributor.authorTIRSCH, D.,
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn0032-0633
dc.description.abstractEnWe compare estimates of atmospheric precipitation during the Martian Noachian-Hesperian boundary 3.8 Gyr ago as calculated in a radiative-convective column model of the atmosphere with runoff values estimated from a geomorphological analysis of dendritic valley network discharge rates. In the atmospheric model, we assume CO2-H2O-N2 atmospheres with surface pressures varying from 20 mb to 3 bar with input solar luminosity reduced to 75% the modern value. Results from the valley network analysis are of the order of a few mm d-1 liquid water precipitation (1.5-10.6 mm d-1, with a median of 3.1 mm d-1). Atmospheric model results are much lower, from about 0.001-1 mm d-1 of snowfall (depending on CO2 partial pressure). Hence, the atmospheric model predicts a significantly lower amount of precipitated water than estimated from the geomorphological analysis. Furthermore, global mean surface temperatures are below freezing, i.e. runoff is most likely not directly linked to precipitation. Therefore, our results strongly favor a cold early Mars with episodic snowmelt as a source for runoff. Our approach is challenged by mostly unconstrained parameters, e.g. greenhouse gas abundance, global meteorology (for example, clouds) and planetary parameters such as obliquity- which affect the atmospheric result - as as well as by inherent problems in estimating discharge and runoff on ancient Mars, such as a lack of knowledge on infiltration and evaporation rates and on flooding timescales, which affect the geomorphological data. Nevertheless, our work represents a first step in combining and interpreting quantitative tools applied in early Mars atmospheric and geomorphological studies.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.title.enEstimating precipitation on early Mars using a radiative-convective model of the atmosphere and comparison with inferred runoff from geomorphology
dc.typeArticle de revue
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pss.2014.11.018
dc.subject.halPhysique [physics]/Astrophysique [astro-ph]
dc.identifier.arxiv1411.5144V
bordeaux.journalPlanetary and Space Science
bordeaux.page133-147
bordeaux.volume105
bordeaux.peerReviewedoui
hal.identifierhal-01090975
hal.version1
hal.popularnon
hal.audienceInternationale
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//hal-01090975v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Planetary%20and%20Space%20Science&rft.date=2015&rft.volume=105&rft.spage=133-147&rft.epage=133-147&rft.eissn=0032-0633&rft.issn=0032-0633&rft.au=VON%20PARIS,%20P.&PETAU,%20A.,&GRENFELL,%20J.%20L.,&HAUBER,%20E.,&BREUER,%20D.,&rft.genre=article


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record