Show simple item record

hal.structure.identifierCentre de Recherches et d'Etudes Interdisciplinaires sur le Développement Durable [CREIDD]
dc.contributor.authorREYES, Tatiana
hal.structure.identifierUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte [Natal] [UFRN]
dc.contributor.authorGOUVINHAS, Reidson Pereira
hal.structure.identifierAPESA [Pau]
dc.contributor.authorLARATTE, Bertrand
IDREF: 181621169
hal.structure.identifierCentre de Recherches et d'Etudes Interdisciplinaires sur le Développement Durable [CREIDD]
dc.contributor.authorCHEVALIER, Bruno
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-14T09:40:28Z
dc.date.available2021-05-14T09:40:28Z
dc.date.issued2019-09-16
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/76569
dc.description.abstractEnDespite alefforts for a sustainable production system, many companies are still struggling to implement environmental aspects in their daily product development processes. Among the evaluation and improvement methods, life cycle assessment (LCA) is one of the most popular tools to achieve this goal. Up to date, LCA has been applied to many products, services, and industrial systems to evaluate their environmental impact aspects. However, there is a wide range of indicators available to be applied for LCA, and choosing an inappropriate indicator may lead the product designer to achieve wrong and weak results. Therefore, this paper proposes to overcome this difficulty by developing a method that can be used as a knowledge transfer to product designers and LCA practitioners in order to help them to make the most appropriate choice of LCA indicators. This method should have some characteristics, such as (a) to be adaptable to a given context and (b) to be dynamic, scalable, and easy to learn. The purpose of this paper is to present the Evaluation Method for Choosing Indicator (EMCI) developed to facilitate the learning process of LCA methods and to quickly select their most appropriate indicators. To validate the EMCI method, a case study on a French textile industry has been implemented. The focus was to evaluate how LCA indicatorsand methods were chosen to be integrated into the suitable eco-design LCA tool.
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject.enLife cycle assessment
dc.subject.enknowledge
dc.subject.enlearning
dc.subject.enchoice of LCIA indicators and methods
dc.subject.eneco- design tools
dc.title.enA method for choosing adapted life cycle assessment indicators as a driver of environmental learning: a French textile case study
dc.typeArticle de revue
dc.subject.halSciences de l'ingénieur [physics]
bordeaux.journalArtificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing
bordeaux.page12
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesInstitut de Mécanique et d’Ingénierie de Bordeaux (I2M) - UMR 5295*
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeaux
bordeaux.institutionBordeaux INP
bordeaux.institutionCNRS
bordeaux.institutionINRAE
bordeaux.institutionArts et Métiers
bordeaux.peerReviewedoui
hal.identifierhal-02318734
hal.version1
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//hal-02318734v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Artificial%20Intelligence%20for%20Engineering%20Design,%20Analysis%20and%20Manufacturing&rft.date=2019-09-16&rft.spage=12&rft.epage=12&rft.au=REYES,%20Tatiana&GOUVINHAS,%20Reidson%20Pereira&LARATTE,%20Bertrand&CHEVALIER,%20Bruno&rft.genre=article


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record