Show simple item record

hal.structure.identifierInstitut Clément Ader [ICA]
dc.contributor.authorJAILLON, Agathe
dc.contributor.authorJUMEL, Julien
hal.structure.identifierInstitut Clément Ader [ICA]
dc.contributor.authorLACHAUD, Frederic
hal.structure.identifierInstitut Clément Ader [ICA]
dc.contributor.authorPAROISSIEN, Eric
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-14T09:34:11Z
dc.date.available2021-05-14T09:34:11Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0021-8464
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/76111
dc.description.abstractEnAdhesive bonding modelling is often realised using cohesive zone models (CZM). For pure mode I loading, these laws represent the cohesive stress versus the interface displacement evolution designated as traction-separation laws (TSL). They enable the description of the interface irreversible phenomena such as damage and/or plasticity, while permitting a refined evaluation of the cohesive stress along the overlap. However, these laws are usually chosen a priori. For brittle and ductile adhesives the TSL shapes usually chosen are respectively bilinear softening and elasto-plastic. But the development of direct CZM measurements has highlighted that the law shapes can be more complex. The wrong initial choice of the TSL shape can then have an impact on the simulation results reliability. In this article, several methods used to evaluate CZM parameters are compared in terms of TSL shape robustness. Synthetic noisy data generated from a trapezoidal CZM are used for the inverse identification of a bilinear softening TSL. By applying this procedure on different type of synthetic measurements (respectively Force-displacement, J-integral, backface strain and DIC) the ability of these techniques to capture parameters for a chosen CZM shape that is not the right one enables a rigorous evaluation the robustness to the law shape.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis
dc.subject.enPeel
dc.subject.enStatistical analysis
dc.subject.enCohesive zone models
dc.subject.enRobustness
dc.subject.enMechanical properties of adhesives
dc.subject.enAnalytical models
dc.title.enMode I cohesive zone model parameters identification and comparison of measurement techniques for robustness to the law shape evaluation
dc.typeArticle de revue
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00218464.2019.1669450
dc.subject.halSciences de l'ingénieur [physics]/Mécanique [physics.med-ph]/Mécanique des matériaux [physics.class-ph]
bordeaux.journalJournal of Adhesion
bordeaux.page272-299
bordeaux.volume96
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesInstitut de Mécanique et d’Ingénierie de Bordeaux (I2M) - UMR 5295*
bordeaux.issue1-4
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeaux
bordeaux.institutionBordeaux INP
bordeaux.institutionCNRS
bordeaux.institutionINRAE
bordeaux.institutionArts et Métiers
bordeaux.peerReviewedoui
hal.identifierhal-02882350
hal.version1
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//hal-02882350v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Adhesion&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=1-4&rft.spage=272-299&rft.epage=272-299&rft.eissn=0021-8464&rft.issn=0021-8464&rft.au=JAILLON,%20Agathe&JUMEL,%20Julien&LACHAUD,%20Frederic&PAROISSIEN,%20Eric&rft.genre=article


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record