Show simple item record

hal.structure.identifierCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes = Nantes University Hospital [CHU Nantes]
dc.contributor.authorBONIN, Mickael
hal.structure.identifierITX - unité de recherche de l'institut du thorax [ITX]
dc.contributor.authorGUERIN, Patrice
hal.structure.identifierCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique [CNRS]
hal.structure.identifierInstitut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie [I2M]
dc.contributor.authorOLIVE, Jean-Marc
hal.structure.identifierRegenerative Medicine and Skeleton [RMeS]
dc.contributor.authorJORDANA, Fabienne
hal.structure.identifierITX - unité de recherche de l'institut du thorax [ITX]
dc.contributor.authorHUCHET, François
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-14T09:33:45Z
dc.date.available2021-05-14T09:33:45Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-18
dc.identifier.issn1522-1946
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/76077
dc.description.abstractEnObjectives The purpose of the study was to develop a standardized and global bench test protocol to evaluate the biomechanical characteristics of the most currently used drug-eluting coronary stents. Background The use of coronary stents has contributed to the reduction of cardiovascular mortality but can be associated with specific complications. Improving the biomechanical matching between the stents and the coronary anatomy may reduce these complications. Methods We assessed five commercially available drug-eluting stents: the Absorb, Orsiro, Resolute Onyx, Synergy, and Xience Alpine stents. Following stent deployment at nominal pressure in ambient air, radial elastic recoil and foreshortening were measured. Flexibility (crimped and deployed stents) and longitudinal and radial resistances were evaluated using a mechanical tester. Results Biomechanical characteristics were significantly different for all tested devices (ANOVA, P < 0.01). The Synergy, Orsiro, and Xience Alpine stents presented the lowest elastic recoil. The Synergy and Resolute Onyx stents were the most flexible devices. The Xience Alpine and Absorb stents had the highest longitudinal and radial resistances. Conclusions Drug-eluting coronary stents used in current clinical practice have very different biomechanical characteristics, which should be taken into consideration to select the most appropriate device for each clinical situation.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.title.enStandardized bench test evaluation of coronary stents: Biomechanical characteristics
dc.typeArticle de revue
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ccd.27912
dc.subject.halSciences de l'ingénieur [physics]
dc.subject.halPhysique [physics]/Mécanique [physics]/Matériaux et structures en mécanique [physics.class-ph]
dc.subject.halPhysique [physics]/Mécanique [physics]/Mécanique des matériaux [physics.class-ph]
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Ingénierie biomédicale/Biomatériaux
bordeaux.journalCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
bordeaux.pageE465-E470
bordeaux.volume92
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesInstitut de Mécanique et d’Ingénierie de Bordeaux (I2M) - UMR 5295*
bordeaux.issue7
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeaux
bordeaux.institutionBordeaux INP
bordeaux.institutionCNRS
bordeaux.institutionINRAE
bordeaux.institutionArts et Métiers
bordeaux.peerReviewedoui
hal.identifierhal-02910304
hal.version1
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//hal-02910304v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&amp;rft.jtitle=Catheterization%20and%20Cardiovascular%20Interventions&amp;rft.date=2018-05-18&amp;rft.volume=92&amp;rft.issue=7&amp;rft.spage=E465-E470&amp;rft.epage=E465-E470&amp;rft.eissn=1522-1946&amp;rft.issn=1522-1946&amp;rft.au=BONIN,%20Mickael&amp;GUERIN,%20Patrice&amp;OLIVE,%20Jean-Marc&amp;JORDANA,%20Fabienne&amp;HUCHET,%20Fran%C3%A7ois&amp;rft.genre=article


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record