Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorGALAR-MARTÍNEZ, Mónica
dc.contributor.authorTORRES, Nazareth
dc.contributor.authorSEBASTIÁN, Bárbara
dc.contributor.authorPALACIOS, Julián
dc.contributor.authorARZOZ, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorJUANENA, Nahiara
dc.contributor.authorVILLA-LLOP, Ana
dc.contributor.authorLOIDI, Maite
hal.structure.identifierEcophysiologie et Génomique Fonctionnelle de la Vigne [UMR EGFV]
dc.contributor.authorDEWASME, Coralie
dc.contributor.authorROBY, Jean Phillippe
dc.contributor.authorSANTESTEBAN, Luis Gonzaga
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-21T12:29:57Z
dc.date.available2025-05-21T12:29:57Z
dc.date.issued2024-09-09
dc.identifier.issn1755-0238en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/206670
dc.description.abstractEnGrapevine pruning is an agronomical operation required to regulate growth and yield, improve fruit quality, and maintain plant health and vigour. However, the intensification of the crop in the last decades, driven by efforts to increase productivity and decrease costs, has led to reduced attention to this operation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether different pruning styles during the first years of vineyard training affect grapevine development. Three pruning styles were followed in a newly planted cv. “Tempranillo” vineyard for four consecutive pruning seasons: (i) respectful (RESP), where pruning cuts were always made leaving protection wood between the cut and vine perennial structures, and the preferential sap flow path was chosen; (ii) aggressive (AGGR), where no protection wood was left and, when possible, the nonpreferential sap flow path was followed; and (iii) winegrape grower (WIN), where the common practices used in the area were followed, which corresponds to an intermediate style between RESP and AGGR. In general, the RESP style increased the vegetative development compared to WIN and AGGR styles over the years and produced a higher yield in the first production year, although the intensity of the effect was not the same in the two vineyards considered. This was the first effort to systematically assess the effects of respectful pruning techniques on vine vegetative growth and demonstrate scientifically its impact.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subject.enGrapevine
dc.subject.enPruning
dc.subject.enFruit quality
dc.subject.enPlant health
dc.title.enRespectful Pruning Improves Grapevine Development: A Case Study in Young Vineyards
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1155/2024/8448405en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Biologie végétaleen_US
bordeaux.journalAustralian Journal of Grape and Wine Researchen_US
bordeaux.volume2024en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesEcophysiologie et Génomique Fonctionnelle de la Vigne (EGFV) - UMR 1287en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionBordeaux Sciences Agroen_US
bordeaux.institutionINRAEen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exportfalse
dc.rights.ccCC BYen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Australian%20Journal%20of%20Grape%20and%20Wine%20Research&rft.date=2024-09-09&rft.volume=2024&rft.eissn=1755-0238&rft.issn=1755-0238&rft.au=GALAR-MART%C3%8DNEZ,%20M%C3%B3nica&TORRES,%20Nazareth&SEBASTI%C3%81N,%20B%C3%A1rbara&PALACIOS,%20Juli%C3%A1n&ARZOZ,%20Ignacio&rft.genre=article


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record