LECIS COCCO ORTU, Anna Maria; GROPPI, Tania

doi:10.5040/9781509960200.ch-019

Métadonnées

Afficher la notice complète

Licence d’utilisation du document

LECIS COCCO ORTU, Anna Maria
Centre Émile Durkheim [CED]

GROPPI, Tania
Université de Sienne

Langue

Chapitre d'ouvrage

Ce document a été publié dans

Constitutional Reasoning in Latin America and the Caribbean, Constitutional Reasoning in Latin America and the Caribbean. 2024-09-09p. 389-406

Hart Publishing

Résumé en anglais

The interpretative methods and judicial reasoning of the regional courts of human rights have drawn the attention of doctrine for a long time. In the last ten years, authors have especially put their attention on the transjudicial communication among these courts, and especially between the Interamerican Court of Human Rights (hereinafter also IACtHR) and the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter also ECtHR) because of their seniority and their greater effectiveness. Several authors have thus recently highlighted the emergence of a certain tendency of the two Courts to look at each other and in some cases even to quote each other. These studies often come to different conclusions on the existence of a real ‘dialogue’ between the two Courts....< Réduire

Métadonnées

Partager cette publication !

Licence d’utilisation du document

The Constitutional Dialogue between the Inter-American and the European Courts of Human Rights: Toward an Increasing Influence of the Inter-American Jurisprudence?

Langue

Ce document a été publié dans

Résumé en anglais

URI

DOI

Origine

Unités de recherche