commentary on the judgment Cass. Soc., September 13, 2023, no. 22-17340 to 17342
| hal.structure.identifier | Centre de droit comparé du travail et de la sécurité sociale [COMPTRASEC] | |
| dc.contributor.author | LAVAUD-LEGENDRE, Bénédicte | |
| hal.structure.identifier | Centre de droit comparé, européen et international [CDCEI] | |
| dc.contributor.author | PORTA, Jérôme | |
| dc.date | 2024 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-03T02:06:42Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-09-03T02:06:42Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2024 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0168-6526 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/201388 | |
| dc.description.abstractEn | In a remarkable turnaround, the Social Chamber rejected the employer's criticism of the appeal. In the absence of an interpretation of Article L. 3141-3 of the French Labor Code in line with Article 7 of Directive 2003/88/EC (cited above), the Cour de cassation ruled that the Court of Appeal had rightly set aside part of the provisions of domestic law that were contrary to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Accordingly, the Court of Appeal correctly ruled that the employees had acquired rights to paid leave during the suspension of their employment contract due to non-occupational illness. | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Brill | |
| dc.subject.en | Organisation of working time - Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of November 4 | |
| dc.subject.en | 2003 - Acquisition of rights to paid leave - Conditions - Establishment by a Member State of an employee's actual work obligation - Scope - Provision of national law contrary to Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of November 4 | |
| dc.subject.en | 2003 and to article 31 | |
| dc.subject.en | § 2 | |
| dc.subject.en | of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Suspension of employment contract - Case - Work stoppage due to non-occupational illness - Office of the judge - Obligation to interpret national law in conformity with EU law – Scope of the judgement. | |
| dc.title.en | commentary on the judgment Cass. Soc., September 13, 2023, no. 22-17340 to 17342 | |
| dc.type | Article de revue | |
| dc.subject.hal | Sciences de l'Homme et Société | |
| bordeaux.journal | International Labour Law Reports | |
| bordeaux.volume | 2 | |
| bordeaux.hal.laboratories | Centre de Droit Comparé du Travail et de la Sécurité Sociale (COMPTRASEC) - UMR 5114 | * |
| bordeaux.issue | 43 | |
| bordeaux.institution | Université de Bordeaux | |
| bordeaux.institution | CNRS | |
| bordeaux.peerReviewed | oui | |
| hal.identifier | halshs-04681574 | |
| hal.version | 1 | |
| hal.popular | non | |
| hal.audience | Internationale | |
| hal.origin.link | https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//halshs-04681574v1 | |
| bordeaux.COinS | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=International%20Labour%20Law%20Reports&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=43&rft.eissn=0168-6526&rft.issn=0168-6526&rft.au=LAVAUD-LEGENDRE,%20B%C3%A9n%C3%A9dicte&PORTA,%20J%C3%A9r%C3%B4me&rft.genre=article |
Files in this item
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
|
There are no files associated with this item. |
|||