Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPOTTER, Rachael
dc.contributor.authorERTEL, Michael
dc.contributor.authorDOLLARD, Maureen
dc.contributor.authorLEKA, Stavroula
dc.contributor.authorJAIN, Aditya
hal.structure.identifierCentre de droit comparé du travail et de la sécurité sociale [COMPTRASEC]
dc.contributor.authorLEROUGE, Loïc
dc.contributor.authorHOUTMAN, Irene
dc.contributor.authorAUST, Birgit
dc.contributor.authorCHOI, Won-Jun
dc.contributor.authorCROOKS, Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorFITZGERALD, John
dc.contributor.authorHASSAN, Siti Nurani
dc.contributor.authorKIRK-BROWN, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorMISHIBA, Takenori
dc.contributor.authorSPETCH, Ashley
dc.contributor.authorSTOETZER, Ulrich
dc.contributor.authorVAN DIJK, Pieter
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-28T02:05:10Z
dc.date.available2024-08-28T02:05:10Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn0019-8366
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/201336
dc.description.abstractEnWorker psychological health is a significant global imperative which requires national policy action and stakeholder engagement. While national policy is a critical lever for improving worker psychological health, some countries are more progressive than others in relation to policy development and/or implementation. At the Joint Congress of the International Commission on Occupational Health, Scientific Committee on Work Organization and Psychosocial Factors and the Asia Pacific Academy for Psychosocial Factors Work in Tokyo (September 2023), a Global Roundtable was designed to initiate international dialogue and knowledge exchange regarding relevant national policy approaches. The Global Roundtable involved experts from diverse regions alongside an engaged audience of congress attendees and facilitators. Qualitative data were analysed against the five components of the National Policy Index tool, comprising policy priority, specific laws, nation-wide initiatives, sector-oriented initiatives, national survey and/or studies. Analysis revealed that while work-related psychological health is a policy priority across many countries, at the same time, there are global gaps in both legislation specificity and active regulation across different countries. For future policy development across countries, it will be beneficial to continue and deepen international discourse and for countries to share their approaches with others.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherNational Institute of Occupational Safety and Health
dc.title.enJoint ICOH-WOPS & APA-PFAW global roundtable perspectives: exploring national policy approaches for psychological health at work through the ‘National Policy Index’ lens
dc.typeArticle de revue
dc.identifier.doi10.2486/indhealth.2024-0092
dc.subject.halSciences de l'Homme et Société
bordeaux.journalIndustrial Health
bordeaux.page2024-0092
bordeaux.volume62
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesCentre de Droit Comparé du Travail et de la Sécurité Sociale (COMPTRASEC) - UMR 5114*
bordeaux.issue5
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeaux
bordeaux.institutionCNRS
bordeaux.peerReviewedoui
hal.identifierhalshs-04678962
hal.version1
hal.popularnon
hal.audienceInternationale
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//halshs-04678962v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Industrial%20Health&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2024-0092&rft.epage=2024-0092&rft.eissn=0019-8366&rft.issn=0019-8366&rft.au=POTTER,%20Rachael&ERTEL,%20Michael&DOLLARD,%20Maureen&LEKA,%20Stavroula&JAIN,%20Aditya&rft.genre=article


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record