MASTRETTA‐YANES, Alicia; DA SILVA, Jessica; GRUEBER, Catherine; CASTILLO‐REINA, Luis; KÖPPÄ, Viktoria; FORESTER, Brenna; FUNK, W. Chris; HEUERTZ, Myriam; ISHIHAMA, Fumiko; JORDAN, Rebecca; MERGEAY, Joachim; PAZ‐VINAS, Ivan; RINCON‐PARRA, Victor; RODRIGUEZ‐MORALES, Maria; ARREDONDO‐AMEZCUA, Libertad; BRAHY, Gaëlle; DESAIX, Matt; DURKEE, Lily; HAMILTON, Ashley; HUNTER, Margaret; KOONTZ, Austin; LANG, Iris; LATORRE‐CÁRDENAS, María; LATTY, Tanya; LLANES‐QUEVEDO, Alexander; MACDONALD, Anna; MAHONEY, Meg; MILLER, Caitlin; ORNELAS, Juan; RAMÍREZ‐BARAHONA, Santiago; ROBERTSON, Erica; RUSSO, Isa‐rita; SANTIAGO, Metztli; SHAW, Robyn; SHEA, Glenn; SJÖGREN‐GULVE, Per; SPENCE, Emma; STACK, Taylor; SUÁREZ, Sofía; TAKENAKA, Akio; THURFJELL, Henrik; TURBEK, Sheela; VAN DER MERWE, Marlien; VISSER, Fleur; WEGIER, Ana; WOOD, Georgina; ZARZA, Eugenia; LAIKRE, Linda; HOBAN, Sean

doi:10.1111/ele.14461

Métadonnées

Afficher la notice complète

Licence d’utilisation du document

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/

MASTRETTA‐YANES, Alicia
Colegio de Postgraduados [CP]

DA SILVA, Jessica
University of Johannesburg [South Africa] [UJ]

GRUEBER, Catherine
The University of Sydney

Langue

Article de revue

Ce document a été publié dans

Ecology Letters. 2024, vol. 27, n° 7, p. e14461

Wiley

Résumé en anglais

Under the recently adopted Kunming‐Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, 196 Parties committed to reporting the status of genetic diversity for all species. To facilitate reporting, three genetic diversity indicators were developed, two of which focus on processes contributing to genetic diversity conservation: maintaining genetically distinct populations and ensuring populations are large enough to maintain genetic diversity. The major advantage of these indicators is that they can be estimated with or without DNA‐based data. However, demonstrating their feasibility requires addressing the methodological challenges of using data gathered from diverse sources, across diverse taxonomic groups, and for countries of varying socio‐economic status and biodiversity levels. Here, we assess the genetic indicators for 919 taxa, representing 5271 populations across nine countries, including megadiverse countries and developing economies. Eighty‐three percent of the taxa assessed had data available to calculate at least one indicator. Our results show that although the majority of species maintain most populations, 58% of species have populations too small to maintain genetic diversity. Moreover, genetic indicator values suggest that IUCN Red List status and other initiatives fail to assess genetic status, highlighting the critical importance of genetic indicators.< Réduire

Mots clés en anglais

biodiversity indicators

Convention on Biological Diversity

COP15

effective population size

populations maintained

Red List

Métadonnées

Licence d’utilisation du document

Multinational evaluation of genetic diversity indicators for the Kunming‐Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework

Langue

Ce document a été publié dans

Résumé en anglais

Mots clés en anglais

DOI

Origine

Unités de recherche