Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorSUITNER, Caterina
dc.contributor.authorMAASS, Anne
dc.contributor.authorNAVARRETE, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorFORMANOWICZ, Magdalena
dc.contributor.authorBRATANOVA, Boyka
dc.contributor.authorCERVONE, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorHAKOKÖNGÄS, Juho Eemeli
dc.contributor.authorKUPPENS, Toon
dc.contributor.authorLIPOURLI, Eleni
dc.contributor.authorRAKIĆ, Tamara
dc.contributor.authorSCATOLON, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorTEIXEIRA, Catia P.
dc.contributor.authorWANG, Zhenlan
dc.contributor.authorSOBRAL, Maria Pedro
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire de psychologie [LabPsy]
dc.contributor.authorCARRIER, Antonin
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-06T10:25:29Z
dc.date.available2024-02-06T10:25:29Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-10
dc.identifier.issn0142-7164en_US
dc.identifier.urioai:crossref.org:10.1017/s0142716420000831
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/187887
dc.description.abstractEnAbstractThe spatial agency bias predicts that people whose native language is rightward written will predominantly envisage action along the same direction. Two mechanisms contribute jointly to this asymmetry: (a) an embodied process related to writing/reading; (b) a linguistic regularity according to which sentence subjects (typically the agent) tend to precede objects (typically the recipient). Here we test a novel hypothesis in relation to the second mechanism, namely, that this asymmetry will be most pronounced in languages with rigid word order. A preregistered study on 14 European languages (n = 420) varying in word order flexibility confirmed a rightward bias in drawings of interactions between two people (agent and recipient). This bias was weaker in more flexible languages, confirming that embodied and linguistic features of language interact in producing it.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.sourcecrossref
dc.title.enSpatial agency bias and word order flexibility: A comparison of 14 European languages
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/s0142716420000831en_US
dc.subject.halSciences de l'Homme et Société/Psychologieen_US
bordeaux.journalApplied Psycholinguisticsen_US
bordeaux.page657-671en_US
bordeaux.volume42en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesLaboratoire de psychologie (LabPsy) - UR 4139en_US
bordeaux.issue3en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
bordeaux.import.sourcedissemin
hal.identifierhal-04440945
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2024-02-06T10:25:35Z
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exporttrue
workflow.import.sourcedissemin
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Applied%20Psycholinguistics&rft.date=2021-02-10&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=657-671&rft.epage=657-671&rft.eissn=0142-7164&rft.issn=0142-7164&rft.au=SUITNER,%20Caterina&MAASS,%20Anne&NAVARRETE,%20Eduardo&FORMANOWICZ,%20Magdalena&BRATANOVA,%20Boyka&rft.genre=article


Archivos en el ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem