Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorDE WILDE, Matthias
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire de psychologie [LabPsy]
dc.contributor.authorCARRIER, Antonin
ORCID: 0000-0001-5921-0887
IDREF: 185197124
dc.contributor.authorCASINI, Annalisa
dc.contributor.authorDEMOULIN, Stéphanie
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-06T10:17:25Z
dc.date.available2024-02-06T10:17:25Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-22
dc.identifier.issn0360-0025en_US
dc.identifier.urioai:crossref.org:10.1007/s11199-020-01192-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/187885
dc.description.abstractEnThe belief that sexualization might be used as a source of power for women in Western societies is spreading (Anderson 2014; Erchull and Liss 2013). The present research aims at evaluating the interpersonal consequences for women endorsing this belief. In three experimental studies with Belgian and French participants (100 college men in Study 1; 135 men in Study 2; 203 women in Study 3), we examine how women who intentionally self-sexualize (i.e., endorse a sex-is-power belief; SIPB) are perceived on four facets of social judgment (i.e., agency, morality, competence, warmth). Furthermore, we compare the perception of women endorsing SIPB to the perception of those who enact body surveillance (BSV), a behavior commonly associated with passive self-objectification, and we explore the expected and actual objectifying behaviors these targets elicit. Results indicate that women engaged in BSV were negatively evaluated on the four facets of social judgment, were perceived as more likely to experience daily objectification, and were more objectified by men than women who do not. The same pattern of results emerges for women endorsing (vs. not) SIPB, except that their agency is acknowledged. We discuss the societal consequences of intentional self-sexualization, whether empowering or not.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.sourcecrossref
dc.subject.enObjectification
dc.subject.enEmpowerment
dc.subject.enSelf-sexualization
dc.subject.enSocial perception
dc.subject.enGender stereotype
dc.title.enThe Drawback of Sexual Empowerment: Perceiving Women as Emancipated but Still as Sexual Objects
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11199-020-01192-4en_US
dc.subject.halSciences de l'Homme et Société/Psychologieen_US
bordeaux.journalSex Rolesen_US
bordeaux.page626-643en_US
bordeaux.volume84en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesLaboratoire de psychologie (LabPsy) - UR 4139en_US
bordeaux.issue9-10en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
bordeaux.import.sourcedissemin
hal.identifierhal-04440905
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2024-02-06T10:17:27Z
hal.popularnonen_US
hal.audienceInternationaleen_US
hal.exporttrue
workflow.import.sourcedissemin
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Sex%20Roles&rft.date=2020-09-22&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=9-10&rft.spage=626-643&rft.epage=626-643&rft.eissn=0360-0025&rft.issn=0360-0025&rft.au=DE%20WILDE,%20Matthias&CARRIER,%20Antonin&CASINI,%20Annalisa&DEMOULIN,%20St%C3%A9phanie&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée