Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorNOBILE, Benedicte
dc.contributor.authorBELZEAUX, Raoul
hal.structure.identifierNutrition et Neurobiologie intégrée [NutriNeuro]
dc.contributor.authorAOUIZERATE, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorDUBERTRET, Caroline
dc.contributor.authorHAFFEN, Emmanuel
dc.contributor.authorLLORCA, Pierre-Michel
dc.contributor.authorROUX, Paul
dc.contributor.authorPOLOSAN, Mircea
dc.contributor.authorSCHWAN, Raymund
dc.contributor.authorWALTER, Michel
dc.contributor.authorREY, Romain
dc.contributor.authorJANUEL, Dominique
dc.contributor.authorLEBOYER, Marion
dc.contributor.authorBELLIVIER, Frank
dc.contributor.authorETAIN, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorCOURTET, Philippe
dc.contributor.authorOLIE, Emilie
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-30T08:24:14Z
dc.date.available2023-05-30T08:24:14Z
dc.date.issued2023-03-01
dc.identifier.issn0165-1781en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/182357
dc.description.abstractEnSuicidal ideation (SI) is a major suicide risk factor; therefore, it is crucial to identify individuals with SI. Discrepancies between the clinicians and patients’ estimation of SI may lead to under-evaluating the suicide risk. Yet, studies on discrepancies between self- and clinician-rated SI are lacking, although identifying the patients’ sociodemographic and clinical characteristics associated with such discrepancies might help to reduce the under-evaluation risk. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify features associated with SI rating discrepancies in patients with bipolar disorder (BD) because of the high prevalence of suicide in this population. Among the patients recruited by the French network of FondaMental expert centers for BD, patients with SI (i.e. ≥2 for item 12 of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report and/or ≥3 for item 10 of the clinician-rated Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale) were selected and divided in concordant (i.e. SI in both self- and clinician-rated questionnaires; n = 130; 25.6%), and discordant (i.e. SI in only one questionnaire; n = 377; 74.4%). Depression severity was the feature most associated with SI evaluation discrepancy, especially in patients with SI identified only with the self-rated questionnaire. Clinician may under-evaluate SI presence in patients with low depression level.
dc.description.sponsorshipSorbonne Universités à Paris pour l'Enseignement et la Rechercheen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFondaMental-Cohortes - ANR-10-COHO-0010en_US
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.subject.enBipolar disorder
dc.subject.enPsychometric assessment
dc.subject.enSuicidal behavior
dc.subject.enSuicidal ideation
dc.title.enClinical characteristics associated with discrepancies between self- and clinician-rated suicidal ideation in patients with bipolar disorder (FACE-BD cohort)
dc.title.alternativePsychiatry Researchen_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115055en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Neurosciences [q-bio.NC]en_US
dc.identifier.pubmed36680982en_US
bordeaux.journalPsychiatry Researchen_US
bordeaux.page115055en_US
bordeaux.volume321en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesNutriNeuro (Laboratoire de Nutrition et Neurobiologie Intégrée) - UMR 1286en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionINRAEen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.exportfalse
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Psychiatry%20Research&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=321&rft.spage=115055&rft.epage=115055&rft.eissn=0165-1781&rft.issn=0165-1781&rft.au=NOBILE,%20Benedicte&BELZEAUX,%20Raoul&AOUIZERATE,%20Bruno&DUBERTRET,%20Caroline&HAFFEN,%20Emmanuel&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée