The (Virtual) Reality of Social Approach-Avoidance Behaviours: Operationalisation Development and Construct Validity Testing
| dc.rights.license | open | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | NUEL, Ivane | |
| dc.contributor.author | FAYANT, Marie-Pierre | |
| dc.contributor.author | MORGADO, Nicolas | |
| hal.structure.identifier | Laboratoire de psychologie [LabPsy] | |
| dc.contributor.author | SUBRA, Baptiste
ORCID: 0000-0002-2973-7853 IDREF: 13979252X | |
| hal.structure.identifier | Laboratoire de psychologie [LabPsy] | |
| dc.contributor.author | ALEXOPOULOS, Theodore
ORCID: 0000-0001-8281-6449 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-16T08:49:05Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-03-16T08:49:05Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022-01-01 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2474-7394 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | oai:crossref.org:10.1525/collabra.34197 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/172324 | |
| dc.description.abstractEn | Research suggests that interpersonal approach-avoidance behaviours influence group evaluations. However, previous work partly neglected the multi-sensory and contextual cues at stake during interpersonal interactions and may offer a limited picture of the phenomenon. Here, we argue that immersive virtual reality (IVR) represents a useful tool to address this issue. In IVR, we implemented interpersonal approach-avoidance behaviours and tested their construct validity. Based on a careful examination of the literature, we defined two construct validity criteria: the evaluative influence of repeated approach-avoidance behaviours as well as the activation of the corresponding neuropsychological systems. In two experiments (NExp1 = 199, NExp2 = 205), we tested whether, compared to avoidance, approach leads to more positive group evaluations on self-report, reaction time based and behavioural intention measures. Additionally, we investigated whether the IVR operationalisations influence the neuropsychological systems assumed to underlie approach-avoidance behaviours. Overall, the findings are not consistent with the hypotheses and do not conclusively validate our IVR approach-avoidance operationalisation. Although additional research should examine more thoroughly the issues raised by the current work by investigating new ways of implementing approach-avoidance in IVR, the present contribution paves the way for such future developments. Despite these challenges, we encourage a consideration of the full-fledged subtleties of social interactions via adequate tools (IVR) for the study of approach-avoidance. | |
| dc.language.iso | EN | en_US |
| dc.rights | Attribution 3.0 United States | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/ | * |
| dc.source | crossref | |
| dc.subject.en | Approach-avoidance behaviours | |
| dc.subject.en | Social group evaluations | |
| dc.subject.en | Virtual reality | |
| dc.subject.en | Grounded cognition | |
| dc.subject.en | BAS/FFFS | |
| dc.title.en | The (Virtual) Reality of Social Approach-Avoidance Behaviours: Operationalisation Development and Construct Validity Testing | |
| dc.type | Article de revue | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1525/collabra.34197 | en_US |
| bordeaux.journal | Collabra: Psychology | en_US |
| bordeaux.page | 1-19 | en_US |
| bordeaux.volume | 8 | en_US |
| bordeaux.hal.laboratories | Laboratoire de psychologie (LabPsy) - UR 4139 | en_US |
| bordeaux.issue | 1 | en_US |
| bordeaux.institution | Université de Bordeaux | en_US |
| bordeaux.peerReviewed | oui | en_US |
| bordeaux.inpress | non | en_US |
| bordeaux.import.source | dissemin | |
| hal.export | false | |
| workflow.import.source | dissemin | |
| dc.rights.cc | CC BY | en_US |
| bordeaux.COinS | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Collabra:%20Psychology&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1-19&rft.epage=1-19&rft.eissn=2474-7394&rft.issn=2474-7394&rft.au=NUEL,%20Ivane&FAYANT,%20Marie-Pierre&MORGADO,%20Nicolas&SUBRA,%20Baptiste&ALEXOPOULOS,%20Theodore&rft.genre=article |
