Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierBioingénierie tissulaire [BIOTIS]
dc.contributor.authorTOUYA, Nicolas
dc.contributor.authorWASHIO, Ayako
dc.contributor.authorKITAMURA, Chiaki
hal.structure.identifierBioingénierie tissulaire [BIOTIS]
dc.contributor.authorNAVEAU, Adrien
dc.contributor.authorTABATA, Yasuhiko
hal.structure.identifierBioingénierie tissulaire [BIOTIS]
dc.contributor.authorDEVILLARD, Raphaël
hal.structure.identifierBioingénierie tissulaire [BIOTIS]
dc.contributor.authorKEROUREDAN, Olivia
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-01T09:10:44Z
dc.date.available2023-03-01T09:10:44Z
dc.date.issued2022-08
dc.identifier.issn2306-5354en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/172124
dc.description.abstractEnAs the need for efficient, sustainable, customizable, handy and affordable substitute materials for bone repair is critical, this systematic review aimed to assess the use and outcomes of silica-derived inks to promote in vivo bone regeneration. An algorithmic selection of articles was performed following the PRISMA guidelines and PICO method. After the initial selection, 51 articles were included. Silicon in ink formulations was mostly found to be in either the native material, but associated with a secondary role, or to be a crucial additive element used to dope an existing material. The inks and materials presented here were essentially extrusion-based 3D-printed (80%), and, overall, the most investigated animal model was the rabbit (65%) with a femoral defect (51%). Quality (ARRIVE 2.0) and risk of bias (SYRCLE) assessments outlined that although a large majority of ARRIVE items were “reported”, most risks of bias were left “unclear” due to a lack of precise information. Almost all studies, despite a broad range of strategies and formulations, reported their silica-derived material to improve bone regeneration. The rising number of publications over the past few years highlights Si as a leverage element for bone tissue engineering to closely consider in the future.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subject.en3D printing
dc.subject.enbiofabrication
dc.subject.enbioprinting
dc.subject.enbone regeneration
dc.subject.enin vivo
dc.subject.enink
dc.subject.ensilica
dc.subject.ensilicium
dc.subject.ensilicon
dc.subject.entissue engineering
dc.title.enIn Vivo Application of Silica-Derived Inks for Bone Tissue Engineering: A 10-Year Systematic Review
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/bioengineering9080388en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Médecine humaine et pathologieen_US
bordeaux.journalBioengineeringen_US
bordeaux.volume9en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBioingénierie Tissulaire (BioTis) - U1026en_US
bordeaux.issue8en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionCNRSen_US
bordeaux.institutionINSERMen_US
bordeaux.institutionCHU de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionInstitut Bergoniéen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-04009304
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2023-03-01T09:10:51Z
hal.exporttrue
dc.rights.ccCC BYen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Bioengineering&rft.date=2022-08&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=8&rft.eissn=2306-5354&rft.issn=2306-5354&rft.au=TOUYA,%20Nicolas&WASHIO,%20Ayako&KITAMURA,%20Chiaki&NAVEAU,%20Adrien&TABATA,%20Yasuhiko&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée