Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorCELLIER, Robin
dc.contributor.authorBERAIL, Sylvain
dc.contributor.authorEPOVA, Ekaterina
dc.contributor.authorBARRE, Julien
dc.contributor.authorCLAVERIE, Fanny
hal.structure.identifierEcophysiologie et Génomique Fonctionnelle de la Vigne [UMR EGFV]
dc.contributor.authorVAN LEEUWEN, Cornelis
ORCID: 0000-0002-9428-0167
IDREF: 200518208
dc.contributor.authorMILCENT, Stanislas
dc.contributor.authorORS, Patrick
dc.contributor.authorDONARD, Olivier F. X.
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-27T15:45:59Z
dc.date.available2023-02-27T15:45:59Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-04
dc.identifier.issn2494-1271en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/172110
dc.description.abstractEnThirty-nine Champagnes from six different brands originating from the AOC Champagne area were analyzed for major and trace element concentrations in the context of their production processes and in relation to their geographical origins. Inorganic analyses were performed on the must (i.e., grape juice) originating from different AOC areas and the final Champagne. The observed elemental concentrations displayed a very narrow range of variability. Typical concentrations observed in Champagne are expressed in mg/L for elements such as K, Ca, Mg, Na, B, Fe, A, and Mn. They are expressed in µg/L for trace elements such as Sr, Rb, Ba, Cu, Ni, Pb Cr and Li in decreasing order of concentrations. This overall homogeneity was observed for Sr and Rb in particular, which showed a very narrow range of concentrations (150 < Rb < 300 µg/L and 150 < Sr < 350 µg/L) in Champagne. The musts contained similar levels of concentration but showed slightly higher variability since they are directly influenced by the bedrock, which is quite homogenous in the AOC area being studied. Besides the homogeneity of the bedrock, the overall stability of the concentrations recorded in the samples can also be directly linked to the successive blending steps, both at the must level and prior to the final bottling. A detailed analysis of the main additives, sugar, yeast and bentonite, during the Champagne production process, did not show a major impact on the elemental signature of Champagne.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subject.enChampagne
dc.subject.enWinemaking process
dc.subject.enElemental concentrations
dc.subject.enSoil
dc.subject.enBlending
dc.subject.enStability
dc.subject.enMusts
dc.subject.enOenological processes
dc.title.enThe stability of major and trace element concentrations from musts to Champagne during the production process
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.20870/oeno-one.2022.56.1.4520en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Biologie végétaleen_US
bordeaux.journalOeno Oneen_US
bordeaux.page29-40en_US
bordeaux.volume56en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesEcophysiologie et Génomique Fonctionnelle de la Vigne (EGFV) - UMR 1287en_US
bordeaux.issue1en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionBordeaux Sciences Agroen_US
bordeaux.institutionINRAEen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.exportfalse
dc.rights.ccCC BYen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Oeno%20One&rft.date=2022-01-04&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=29-40&rft.epage=29-40&rft.eissn=2494-1271&rft.issn=2494-1271&rft.au=CELLIER,%20Robin&BERAIL,%20Sylvain&EPOVA,%20Ekaterina&BARRE,%20Julien&CLAVERIE,%20Fanny&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée