Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Relational versus structural goals prioritize different social information.

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorNICOLAS, Gandalf
dc.contributor.authorFISKE, Susan T
dc.contributor.authorKOCH, Alex
dc.contributor.authorIMHOFF, Roland
dc.contributor.authorUNKELBACH, Christian
dc.contributor.authorTERACHE, Julie
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire de psychologie [LabPsy]
dc.contributor.authorCARRIER, Antonin
ORCID: 0000-0001-5921-0887
IDREF: 185197124
dc.contributor.authorYZERBYT, Vincent
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-24T11:30:37Z
dc.date.available2023-01-24T11:30:37Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-01
dc.identifier.issn1939-1315en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/171759
dc.description.abstractEnPeople gather information about others along a few fundamental dimensions; their current goals determine which dimensions they most need to know. As proponents of competing social-evaluation models, we sought to study the dimensions that perceivers spontaneously prioritize when gathering information about unknown social groups. Because priorities depend on functions, having relational goals (e.g., deciding whether and how to interact with a group) versus structural goals (e.g., getting an overview of society) should moderate dimensional priorities. Various candidate dimensions could differentiate perceivers’impressions of social groups. For example, the Stereotype Content model argues that people evaluate others in terms of their Warmth (i.e., their Sociability and Morality) and Competence (i.e., their Ability and Assertiveness). Alternatively, the Agency-Beliefs-Communion (ABC) model proposes conservative-progressive Beliefs. Five studies (N = 2,268) found that participants consistently prioritized learning about targets’ Warmth. However, goal moderated priority: When participants had a relational goal, such as an unknown group increasing in their neighborhood, they showed more interest in targets’ Sociability, a facet of Warmth. When participants had a structural goal, such as an unknown group increasing in their nation, they showed more interest in the groups’ Beliefs, as well as increased interest in Competence-related facets. Diverse methods reveal interest in all dimensions, reconciling discrepancies among social-evaluation models by identifying how relational versus structural goals differentiate priorities of the fundamental dimensions proposed by current models. Results have implications for fundamental dimensions of social cognition, more generally.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.subject.enGoal moderator
dc.subject.enInformation gathering
dc.subject.enNatural language
dc.subject.enOpen-ended
dc.subject.enStereotype content
dc.title.enRelational versus structural goals prioritize different social information.
dc.title.alternativeJ Pers Soc Psycholen_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/pspi0000366en_US
dc.subject.halSciences de l'Homme et Société/Psychologie
dc.identifier.pubmed34138603en_US
bordeaux.journalJournal of Personality and Social Psychologyen_US
bordeaux.page659-682en_US
bordeaux.volume122en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesLaboratoire de psychologie (LabPsy) - EA4139en_US
bordeaux.issue4en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
bordeaux.import.sourcepubmed
hal.identifierhal-03966452
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2023-01-31T17:16:46Z
hal.exporttrue
workflow.import.sourcepubmed
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Personality%20and%20Social%20Psychology&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=659-682&rft.epage=659-682&rft.eissn=1939-1315&rft.issn=1939-1315&rft.au=NICOLAS,%20Gandalf&FISKE,%20Susan%20T&KOCH,%20Alex&IMHOFF,%20Roland&UNKELBACH,%20Christian&rft.genre=article


Archivos en el ítem

ArchivosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay archivos asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem