Danaparoid cross-reactivity with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies: report of 12 cases.
TARDY-PONCET, B.
Groupe de recherche sur la thrombose, pharmacologie des antithrombotiques et situations à risque [GRT]
Voir plus >
Groupe de recherche sur la thrombose, pharmacologie des antithrombotiques et situations à risque [GRT]
TARDY-PONCET, B.
Groupe de recherche sur la thrombose, pharmacologie des antithrombotiques et situations à risque [GRT]
Groupe de recherche sur la thrombose, pharmacologie des antithrombotiques et situations à risque [GRT]
TARDY, B.
Groupe de recherche sur la thrombose, pharmacologie des antithrombotiques et situations à risque [GRT]
< Réduire
Groupe de recherche sur la thrombose, pharmacologie des antithrombotiques et situations à risque [GRT]
Langue
en
Article de revue
Ce document a été publié dans
Intensive Care Med. 2009-08, vol. 35, n° 8, p. 1449-53
Résumé en anglais
PURPOSE: Danaparoid is a safe and effective drug for the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). We describe an uncommon complication: danaparoid cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies. DESIGN AND SETTING: A ...Lire la suite >
PURPOSE: Danaparoid is a safe and effective drug for the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). We describe an uncommon complication: danaparoid cross-reactivity with HIT antibodies. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective observational multicenter study on HIT was conducted in France. In this study concerning HIT patients treated with lepirudin, 12 patients were treated with lepirudin because danaparoid cross-reacted with the heparin-dependent antibodies. RESULTS: Three groups of situations can be separated. In a first group, four patients received a short course of danaparoid until their initial functional HIT assay showed a cross-reactivity between danaparoid and HIT antibodies. One patient presented a fatal thrombotic complication but the relationship between this thrombotic complication and danaparoid cross-reactivity cannot be certain. In a second group, four patients received for 4 days at least a danaparoid treatment while the initial functional test did not show any danaparoid cross-reactivity. During danaparoid treatment, no significant increase of platelet count was observed and two patients presented a fatal thrombotic complication. In a third group, cross-reactivity between danaparoid and HIT antibodies was not checked before danaparoid therapy. During danaparoid treatment, no significant increase of platelet count was observed and the four patients developed a venous thromboembolic complication. CONCLUSION: Absence of any increase in platelet count after 3 to 5 days of danaparoid therapy and/or the occurrence of a new thrombotic event should lead to danaparoid cross-reactivity suspicion. However, before attributing thrombotic complications to danaparoid cross-reactivity, it is crucial to verify that the patients received the recommended danaparoid dosage regimen.< Réduire
Origine
Importé de halUnités de recherche