The politics of Amphibiosis: the war against viruses will not take place
Langue
en
Autre document
Ce document a été publié dans
Somatosphère : Science, Medicine, and Anthropology. 2020-04-19
Résumé en anglais
By "We are at war." This was Emmanuel Macron's chosen refrain when he addressed the French nation about the current COVID-19 pandemic. He is certainly not the first to present human/pathogenic microbe relations in this ...Lire la suite >
By "We are at war." This was Emmanuel Macron's chosen refrain when he addressed the French nation about the current COVID-19 pandemic. He is certainly not the first to present human/pathogenic microbe relations in this way. Indeed, the history of immunology and epidemiology is littered with the vocabulary of war. But this presidential rhetoric reveals a certain communication strategy based on national unity, a hackneyed but nevertheless effective argument that is perfectly in keeping with a neoliberal ideology, a context in which the life of society is a constant struggle. Who is at war, and against what? For there to be a war, there needs to be an enemy. But while viruses can maintain close relations with humans, and under certain circumstances may even put their lives in danger, the definition of their intentions only commits those who claim to give it. It is important that the perspective of these humans never be reduced to a universal 'us', which would grant them permission to speak on behalf of others, whether that be entire countries, or the whole of humanity.< Réduire
Mots clés en anglais
War
Viruses
Multispecies
Microbes
Metaphor
COVID-19
coronavirus
Project ANR
Des virus pour soigner: le difficile développement d'une innovation biomédicale contre-intuitive
Origine
Importé de hal