Agenda-setting dynamics in France: Revisiting the 'partisan hypothesis'
BROUARD, Sylvain
Science Politique Relations Internationales Territoire [SPIRIT]
Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques [FNSP]
Science Politique Relations Internationales Territoire [SPIRIT]
Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques [FNSP]
BROUARD, Sylvain
Science Politique Relations Internationales Territoire [SPIRIT]
Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques [FNSP]
< Réduire
Science Politique Relations Internationales Territoire [SPIRIT]
Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques [FNSP]
Langue
en
Article de revue
Ce document a été publié dans
French Politics. 2009-07, vol. 7, n° 2, p. 75-95
Palgrave Macmillan
Résumé en anglais
This paper presents an original way of testing the `partisan hypothesis'. Building on the substantial literature on the party-policy link, we test this link with respect to issue attention, rather than spending or macroeconomic ...Lire la suite >
This paper presents an original way of testing the `partisan hypothesis'. Building on the substantial literature on the party-policy link, we test this link with respect to issue attention, rather than spending or macroeconomic outcomes. We examine the evolution of issue attention through the systematic analysis of agenda setting of three major French political institutions: the President, the government and the National Assembly. Although our results point to partisan differentiation on some issues, the overall conclusion is that partisan differentiation is at best one factor of variation among others.< Réduire
Mots clés en anglais
presidency
political parties
issue attention
France
Agenda-setting
law-making
Origine
Importé de hal