Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorBRAESCO, Veronique
dc.contributor.authorSOUCHON, Isabelle
hal.structure.identifierChimie et Biologie des Membranes et des Nanoobjets [CBMN]
dc.contributor.authorSAUVANT, Patrick
ORCID: 0000-0002-2562-9185
IDREF: 118627325
dc.contributor.authorHAUROGNE, Typhaine
dc.contributor.authorMAILLOT, Matthieu
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorFEART-COURET, Catherine
ORCID: 0000-0002-7959-1610
IDREF: 08195848X
dc.contributor.authorDARMON, Nicole
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-25T08:29:13Z
dc.date.available2022-04-25T08:29:13Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-21
dc.identifier.issn1476-5640 (Electronic) 0954-3007 (Linking)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/139917
dc.description.abstractEnBACKGROUND: In the NOVA classification system, descriptive criteria are used to assign foods to one of four groups based on processing-related criteria. Although NOVA is widely used, its robustness and functionality remain largely unexplored. We determined whether this system leads to consistent food assignments by users. METHODS: French food and nutrition specialists completed an online survey in which they assigned foods to NOVA groups. The survey comprised two lists: one with 120 marketed food products with ingredient information and one with 111 generic food items without ingredient information. We quantified assignment consistency among evaluators using Fleiss' κ (range: 0-1, where 1 = 100% agreement). Hierarchical clustering on principal components identified clusters of foods with similar distributions of NOVA assignments. RESULTS: Fleiss' κ was 0.32 and 0.34 for the marketed foods (n = 159 evaluators) and generic foods (n = 177 evaluators), respectively. There were three clusters within the marketed foods: one contained 90 foods largely assigned to NOVA4 (91% of assignments), while the two others displayed greater assignment heterogeneity. There were four clusters within the generic foods: three clusters contained foods mostly assigned to a single NOVA group (69-79% of assignments), and the fourth cluster comprised 28 foods whose assignments were more evenly distributed across the four NOVA groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although assignments were more consistent for some foods than others, overall consistency among evaluators was low, even when ingredient information was available. These results suggest current NOVA criteria do not allow for robust and functional food assignments.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.title.enUltra-processed foods: how functional is the NOVA system?
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41430-022-01099-1en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed35314769en_US
bordeaux.journalEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutritionen_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionINSERMen_US
bordeaux.institutionBordeaux INP
bordeaux.institutionCNRS
bordeaux.teamLEHA_BPHen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.exportfalse
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=European%20Journal%20of%20Clinical%20Nutrition&rft.date=2022-03-21&rft.eissn=1476-5640%20(Electronic)%200954-3007%20(Linking)&rft.issn=1476-5640%20(Electronic)%200954-3007%20(Linking)&rft.au=BRAESCO,%20Veronique&SOUCHON,%20Isabelle&SAUVANT,%20Patrick&HAUROGNE,%20Typhaine&MAILLOT,%20Matthieu&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée