WILÉN, Nina; BIRANTAMIJE, Gérard; AMBROSETTI, David

doi:10.1080/17531055.2017.1418173

Métadonnées

Afficher la notice complète

Licence d’utilisation du document

WILÉN, Nina

BIRANTAMIJE, Gérard

AMBROSETTI, David
Les Afriques dans le monde [LAM]
Centre Français des Études Ethiopiennes [CFEE]

Langue

Article de revue

Ce document a été publié dans

Journal of Eastern African Studies. 2017-12-19, vol. 12, n° 1, p. 120-135

Taylor & Francis (Routledge)

Résumé en anglais

How can post-conflict militaries with a history of politicized oppression and exclusion achieve professionalization? In this article, we examine the Burundian army's trajectory through the longue durée, studying its role in and for the state from 1966 to the current political crisis. The aim of the article is to increase understanding of how, and to what extent, the Burundian army has managed to professionalize after the end of the civil war in the early 2000s, in spite of its violent and exclusionary history. We argue that the Burundian army has managed to professionalize and depoliticize to a limited extent (and with important constraints) following the end of the civil war due to three factors: (1) an important pre-war heritage of a technically and functionally professional, yet politicized army; (2) a favourable domestic political climate where the army no longer needs to play a political role but can take on the role of domestic peacemaker; (3) significant external training and support related to peacekeeping deployment and Security Sector Reform (SSR). This professionalization has, however, partly been reversed during the recent crisis starting in 2015, showing the fragility of a post-conflict professionalization where ties between officers and political actors are revoked again.< Réduire

Métadonnées

Licence d’utilisation du document

The Burundian army’s trajectory to professionalization and depoliticization, and back again

Langue

Ce document a été publié dans

Résumé en anglais

DOI

Origine

Unités de recherche