Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorKOROBELNIK, Jean-Francois
ORCID: 0000-0002-4438-9535
IDREF: 028739272
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorDELCOURT, Cecile
ORCID: 0000-0002-2099-0481
IDREF: 035105291
dc.contributor.authorCREUZOT-GARCHER, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorMELAINE, Asma
dc.contributor.authorCHASSETUILLIER, Jules
dc.contributor.authorLEJEUNE, Anne
dc.contributor.authorBENARD, Steve
dc.contributor.authorDUPONT-BENJAMIN, Laure
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-04T09:02:51Z
dc.date.available2021-10-04T09:02:51Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-23
dc.identifier.issn1369-6998en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/112537
dc.description.abstractEnAIMS: Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is standard care for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), but the recommended monthly injection regimen is burdensome. Evidence suggests low injection/monitoring frequencies in clinical practice and suboptimal vision outcomes. This observational cohort study uses administrative claims data from the French national healthcare system to assess anti-VEGF treatment patterns and nAMD-specific healthcare resource demands and costs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: nAMD patients ≥50 years initiating intravitreal ranibizumab, aflibercept or bevacizumab treatment (2014‒2015), and propensity score-matched non-nAMD patients (controls), were identified from the Echantillon Généraliste de Bénéficiaires database. Outcomes of interest included anti-VEGF treatment patterns, and healthcare resource utilization and associated costs of patients vis-à-vis controls over 24 months. RESULTS: Study patients (n = 355) received (mean) 5.2 and 2.4 anti-VEGF injections over 0‒12 and 12‒24 months, respectively. Most patients (79.0%) remained on their initial anti-VEGF agent; among treatment switchers the most common transition was from ranibizumab to aflibercept. During follow-up, nAMD patients were more likely than controls to require ophthalmology visits (99.7% vs 44.8%), ocular procedures (optical coherence tomography/angiography/fundoscopy) (96.9% vs 27.2%), cataract surgery (13.0% vs 6.7%), and medical transports (38.0% vs 31.9%). Mean numbers of ophthalmology visits (25.1 vs 1.2) and medical transports (6.0 vs 3.5) were higher (p<.01) among nAMD patients. Total reimbursed costs were two-fold higher for nAMD patients than controls (mean €16,799 vs €8255) due to higher treatment costs (€6847 vs €1156), medical fees (€1858 vs €295), hospital fees (€6396 vs €5235), and transport costs (€358 vs €259). Excess total healthcare cost was (mean) €5279 and €7918 over the first 12 and 24 months of treatment, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Current intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment and monitoring requirements place considerable economic burden on the French healthcare system. New intravitreal therapies with extended dosing intervals and predictable efficacy might reduce demand on ophthalmology services.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subject.enOphthalmology
dc.subject.enNeovascular age-related macular degeneration
dc.subject.enIntravitreal
dc.subject.enAnti-VEGF
dc.subject.enRetrospective
dc.subject.enObservational study
dc.subject.enHealthcare utilization
dc.subject.enCost
dc.subject.enFrance
dc.title.enReal-life management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in France: a nationwide observational study using retrospective claims data
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13696998.2021.1971416en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed34420480en_US
bordeaux.journalJournal of Medical Economicsen_US
bordeaux.page1-37en_US
bordeaux.volume24en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - UMR 1219en_US
bordeaux.issue1en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.institutionINSERMen_US
bordeaux.teamLEHA_BPH
bordeaux.teamLEHA_BPH
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
bordeaux.identifier.funderIDAllerganen_US
hal.exportfalse
dc.rights.ccPas de Licence CCen_US
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&amp;rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Medical%20Economics&amp;rft.date=2021-08-23&amp;rft.volume=24&amp;rft.issue=1&amp;rft.spage=1-37&amp;rft.epage=1-37&amp;rft.eissn=1369-6998&amp;rft.issn=1369-6998&amp;rft.au=KOROBELNIK,%20Jean-Francois&amp;DELCOURT,%20Cecile&amp;CREUZOT-GARCHER,%20Catherine&amp;MELAINE,%20Asma&amp;CHASSETUILLIER,%20Jules&amp;rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée