Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierInstitut des Sciences Moléculaires [ISM]
hal.structure.identifierInstitut de Recherche en Gestion des Organisations [IRGO]
dc.contributor.authorJOURDAINE, Marc
hal.structure.identifierInstitut des Sciences Moléculaires [ISM]
dc.contributor.authorLOUBET, Philippe
hal.structure.identifierInstitut de Recherche en Gestion des Organisations [IRGO]
dc.contributor.authorTREBUCQ, Stephane
hal.structure.identifierInstitut des Sciences Moléculaires [ISM]
dc.contributor.authorSONNEMANN, Guido
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T07:50:28Z
dc.date.available2021-06-08T07:50:28Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-20
dc.identifier.issn0959-6526en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/78846
dc.description.abstractEnThe wine industry is facing two major environmental challenges: consumers are increasingly aware of the impacts of wine making, and production is jeopardized by environmental changes such as global warming. Therefore, there is a growing need to measure and minimize the environmental footprint of the sector. Life cycle assessment has already proven its worth in evaluating the environmental impacts and hotspots of bottled wine production. However, the methodological discrepancies in the LCA conducted do not allow conclusions regarding the most sustainable production systems or the most significant impacts for the sector. Moreover, LCA application in the field remains scarce due to the complexity of the method and the lack of readability of its results. In this study, 10 LCA papers corresponding to 17 different products were reviewed. Methodological discrepancies have been reduced through harmonization of the functional unit, the life cycle inventory and the life cycle impact assessment method, enabling provision of a range of results for different impact categories, as well as comparisons between different wines. The LCI elements that drive the results have been identified. This can be useful to simplify the data collection and the comparability of the products in this sector. Impact clusters (indicators that follow the same behaviour and are driven by the same LCI elements) have been proposed. Three clusters of impacts ((i) climate change, fossil depletion and particulate matter formation; (ii) terrestrial ecotoxicity; (iii) agricultural land occupation) are responsible for more than 90% of the single score. Nonetheless, the proposed harmonization procedure has limitations, and no conclusion can be made on the most sustainable products due to the remaining discrepancies in the system boundaries.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.subject.enHarmonization
dc.subject.enLife cycle assessment
dc.subject.enReview
dc.subject.enWine
dc.title.enA detailed quantitative comparison of the life cycle assessment of bottled wines using an original harmonization procedure
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119472en_US
dc.subject.halSciences de l'Homme et Société/Gestion et managementen_US
bordeaux.journalJournal of Cleaner Productionen_US
bordeaux.page119472en_US
bordeaux.volume250en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesIRGO (Institut de Recherche en Gestion des Organisations) - EA 4190en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.teamRessources humainesen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-03253002
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2021-06-08T07:50:33Z
hal.exporttrue
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Cleaner%20Production&rft.date=2020-03-20&rft.volume=250&rft.spage=119472&rft.epage=119472&rft.eissn=0959-6526&rft.issn=0959-6526&rft.au=JOURDAINE,%20Marc&LOUBET,%20Philippe&TREBUCQ,%20Stephane&SONNEMANN,%20Guido&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée