Afficher la notice abrégée

Dimensioning a product in preliminary design through different exploration techniques

hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire Génie Industriel - EA 2606 [LGI]
dc.contributor.authorYANNOU, Bernard
hal.structure.identifierRoberval [Roberval]
dc.contributor.authorTROUSSIER, Nadège
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire de Génie Civil [LGC]
dc.contributor.authorCHATEAUNEUF, Alaa
hal.structure.identifierRoberval [Roberval]
dc.contributor.authorBOUDAOUD, Nassim
hal.structure.identifierInstitut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie de Bordeaux [I2M]
dc.contributor.authorSCARAVETTI, Dominique
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-14T10:04:20Z
dc.date.available2021-05-14T10:04:20Z
dc.date.issued2009-09-01
dc.identifier.issn1477-9056
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/78474
dc.description.abstractEnOnce a design concept has been chosen and parameterised, the embodiment design stage consists of choosing materials and dimensions to ensure a 'good matching' with the expected performances. In this context of preliminary design stages, several approaches exist, which correspond to slightly different complexities and issues and must consequently be used at different moments. We consider in this paper three families of approaches: 1) exploring design (parametric) dimensioning under uncertainty (through constraint programming techniques, representations of feasible design points or Pareto frontiers) 2) robust design and multidisciplinary optimisation 3) design for reliability. We advocate and state in this paper that these approaches must be used in that order of increasing complexity. Indeed, applying an approach allows one to quickly figure out inadequacies with performance specifications or initial allowable bounds of design parameters and then to backtrack or to refine the design issue before proceeding to the next stage or approach. We illustrate that phenomenon by successively applying the three approaches on a dimensioning issue of a two-member truss structure. We clearly show that the successive optimal designs obtained are notably different, but that the optimal point obtained in a given approach is used to explore its surroundings within the next approach.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInderscience
dc.subjectdesign exploration
dc.subjectrobust design
dc.subjectdesign for reliability
dc.subjectconstraint programming
dc.subjectPareto solutions
dc.subjectembodiment design
dc.subjectparametric design
dc.subjectdesign optimisation
dc.title.enDimensioning a product in preliminary design through different exploration techniques
dc.typeArticle de revue
dc.identifier.doi10.1504/IJPD.2009.026177
dc.subject.halSciences de l'ingénieur [physics]/Mécanique [physics.med-ph]
bordeaux.journalInternational Journal of Product Development
bordeaux.page140-163
bordeaux.volume9
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesInstitut de Mécanique et d’Ingénierie de Bordeaux (I2M) - UMR 5295*
bordeaux.issue1/2/3
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeaux
bordeaux.institutionBordeaux INP
bordeaux.institutionCNRS
bordeaux.institutionINRAE
bordeaux.institutionArts et Métiers
bordeaux.peerReviewedoui
hal.identifierhal-00748725
hal.version1
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//hal-00748725v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=International%20Journal%20of%20Product%20Development&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1/2/3&rft.spage=140-163&rft.epage=140-163&rft.eissn=1477-9056&rft.issn=1477-9056&rft.au=YANNOU,%20Bernard&TROUSSIER,%20Nad%C3%A8ge&CHATEAUNEUF,%20Alaa&BOUDAOUD,%20Nassim&SCARAVETTI,%20Dominique&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée