Afficher la notice abrégée

hal.structure.identifierInstitut de Recherche de l'Ecole Navale [IRENAV]
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire brestois de mécanique et des systèmes [LBMS]
dc.contributor.authorDJEBARRI, Sofiane
hal.structure.identifierInstitut de Recherche de l'Ecole Navale [IRENAV]
dc.contributor.authorFRÉDÉRIC CHARPENTIER, Jean
hal.structure.identifierInstitut de Recherche de l'Ecole Navale [IRENAV]
dc.contributor.authorSCUILLER, Franck
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire brestois de mécanique et des systèmes [LBMS]
dc.contributor.authorBENBOUZID, Mohamed
dc.contributor.editorIEEE
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-14T09:57:49Z
dc.date.available2021-05-14T09:57:49Z
dc.date.issued2014-11-05
dc.date.conference2014-11-05
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/77902
dc.description.abstractEnThe aim of the paper is to compare the design of direct-drive permanent-magnet (PM) generators associated with horizontal axis tidal turbines. The turbine/generator couplings are examined. These turbine/generator couplings consist of a POD and Rim-driven assembly. In a Rim-Driven association the electrical generator active parts are inserted in a duct surrounding the blades. For POD generator insertion, the electrical machine is placed in a nacelle located on the turbine axis. To achieve the generators sizing, a design rated point related to an industrial MCT is defined. The used design models include an electromagnetic model which is linked to a thermal model in an optimization procedure that goals to minimize the active parts cost. Firstly, a single rotor/single stator PM axial flux generator and a radial flux PM generator are designed for a rim-driven MCT specification. For these generators sizing, a comparison of the machines active parts and the machines geometrical dimensions are carried out. Secondly, radial flux PM generators are designed for Rim-Driven and POD assembly and a comparison is performed for this study case. Finally, the influence of the POD diameter on the generator electromagnetic design is studied. It shows that the active parts costs are minimized, when the generator diameter is around 1/3 of the turbine diameter for the considered specifications. These performed comparisons between the considered study cases aims to help designers in their technologies choices.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherIEEE
dc.subject.enPM Generators
dc.subject.enRim-Driven
dc.subject.enPOD
dc.subject.enMarine Current turbine
dc.title.enComparison of direct-drive PM generators for tidal turbines
dc.typeCommunication dans un congrès avec actes
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/PEAC.2014.7037902
dc.subject.halSciences de l'ingénieur [physics]/Energie électrique
bordeaux.page474-479
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesInstitut de Mécanique et d’Ingénierie de Bordeaux (I2M) - UMR 5295*
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeaux
bordeaux.institutionBordeaux INP
bordeaux.institutionCNRS
bordeaux.institutionINRAE
bordeaux.institutionArts et Métiers
bordeaux.countryCN
bordeaux.title.proceedingIEEE PEAC 2014
bordeaux.conference.cityShanghai
bordeaux.peerReviewedoui
hal.identifierhal-01120831
hal.version1
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//hal-01120831v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.date=2014-11-05&rft.spage=474-479&rft.epage=474-479&rft.au=DJEBARRI,%20Sofiane&FR%C3%89D%C3%89RIC%20CHARPENTIER,%20Jean&SCUILLER,%20Franck&BENBOUZID,%20Mohamed&rft.genre=proceeding


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée