Afficher la notice abrégée

Designing an argumentative decision-aiding tool for urban planning. AIPA : an interface between multicriteria decision aiding and argumentative frameworks

hal.structure.identifierInstitut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie de Bordeaux [I2M]
dc.contributor.authorDELHOMME, Benjamin
IDREF: 228324343
hal.structure.identifierInstitut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie de Bordeaux [I2M]
dc.contributor.authorTAILLANDIER, Franck
dc.contributor.authorABI-ZEID, Irène
hal.structure.identifierIngénierie des Agro-polymères et Technologies Émergentes [UMR IATE]
hal.structure.identifierGraphs for Inferences on Knowledge [GRAPHIK]
dc.contributor.authorTHOMOPOULOS, Rallou
hal.structure.identifierInstitut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie de Bordeaux [I2M]
dc.contributor.authorBAUDRIT, Cedric
IDREF: 095921443
hal.structure.identifierInstitut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie de Bordeaux [I2M]
dc.contributor.authorMORA, Laurent
IDREF: 077660870
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-14T09:34:55Z
dc.date.available2021-05-14T09:34:55Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.conference2017-10-26
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/76165
dc.description.abstractEnUrban planning is an important issue for all cities. In order to meet the challenges of sustainable urban planning, we propose a participative decision-support tool that allows stakeholders to engage jointly in structuring a decision process, to identify alternatives, to construct criteria, to challenge their relevance and to evaluate them. The novelty in our approach is the use of an argumentative approach to support multicriteria decision aiding. The use of an argumentative framework allows the stakeholders to formalize the decision problem by taking explicitly into account the diverse opinions expressed and ensuring their traceability. Through the argumentative approach, our goalis thus to enhance participatory decision making by organizing and formalizing debates between stakeholders. To this effect, we propose AIPA, an interface the makes the transition between natural language and abstract argumentation systems. Our aim is to place debates at the center of the decision analysis process in order to facilitate the acceptance of the final decision by all parties.
dc.language.isoen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
dc.subjectoutil d'aide à la décision
dc.subjectméthode multicritère
dc.subjectaménagement urbain
dc.subjectprocessus de décision
dc.subject.enDecision-aiding
dc.subject.enArgumentative approach
dc.subject.enParticipative decision
dc.subject.enMulticriteria decision analysis
dc.subject.enurban planning
dc.title.enDesigning an argumentative decision-aiding tool for urban planning. AIPA : an interface between multicriteria decision aiding and argumentative frameworks
dc.typeCommunication dans un congrès avec actes
dc.subject.halInformatique [cs]/Intelligence artificielle [cs.AI]
dc.subject.halSciences de l'Homme et Société/Gestion et management
bordeaux.pagenp
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesInstitut de Mécanique et d’Ingénierie de Bordeaux (I2M) - UMR 5295*
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeaux
bordeaux.institutionBordeaux INP
bordeaux.institutionCNRS
bordeaux.institutionINRAE
bordeaux.institutionArts et Métiers
bordeaux.countryFR
bordeaux.title.proceedingColloque OPDE 2017
bordeaux.conference.cityMontpellier
bordeaux.peerReviewedoui
hal.identifierhal-01837517
hal.version1
hal.origin.linkhttps://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr//hal-01837517v1
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.date=2017&rft.spage=np&rft.epage=np&rft.au=DELHOMME,%20Benjamin&TAILLANDIER,%20Franck&ABI-ZEID,%20Ir%C3%A8ne&THOMOPOULOS,%20Rallou&BAUDRIT,%20Cedric&rft.genre=proceeding


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée