Afficher la notice abrégée

ABA-mediated responses to water deficit separate grapevine genotypes by their genetic background

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
hal.structure.identifierEcophysiologie et Génomique Fonctionnelle de la Vigne [UMR EGFV]
dc.contributor.authorROSSDEUTSCH, Landry
dc.contributor.authorEDWARDS, Everard
hal.structure.identifierEcophysiologie et Génomique Fonctionnelle de la Vigne [UMR EGFV]
dc.contributor.authorCOOKSON, Sarah Jane
IDREF: 22161009X
hal.structure.identifierEcophysiologie et Génomique Fonctionnelle de la Vigne [UMR EGFV]
dc.contributor.authorBARRIEU, Francois
IDREF: 098033891
hal.structure.identifierEcophysiologie et Génomique Fonctionnelle de la Vigne [UMR EGFV]
dc.contributor.authorGAMBETTA, Gregory
ORCID: 0000-0002-8838-5050
IDREF: 225449641
hal.structure.identifierEcophysiologie et Génomique Fonctionnelle de la Vigne [UMR EGFV]
dc.contributor.authorDELROT, Serge
IDREF: 058711503
hal.structure.identifierEcophysiologie et Génomique Fonctionnelle de la Vigne [UMR EGFV]
dc.contributor.authorOLLAT, Nathalie
IDREF: 126740062
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-29T12:51:02Z
dc.date.available2020-03-29T12:51:02Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1471-2229en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/4008
dc.description.abstractEnBackground: ABA-mediated processes are involved in plant responses to water deficit, especially the control of stomatal opening. However in grapevine it is not known if these processes participate in the phenotypic variation in drought adaptation existing between genotypes. To elucidate this question, the response to short-term water-deficit was analysed in roots and shoots of nine Vitis genotypes differing in their drought adaptation in the field. The transcript abundance of 12 genes involved in ABA biosynthesis, catabolism, and signalling were monitored, together with physiological and metabolic parameters related to ABA and its role in controlling plant transpiration. [br/] Results: Although transpiration and ABA responses were well-conserved among the genotypes, multifactorial analyses separated Vitis vinifera varieties and V. berlandieri x V. rupestris hybrids (all considered drought tolerant) from the other genotypes studied. Generally, V. vinifera varieties, followed by V. berlandieri x V. rupestris hybrids, displayed more pronounced responses to water-deficit in comparison to the other genotypes. However, changes in transcript abundance in roots were more pronounced for Vitis hybrids than V. vinifera genotypes. Changes in the expression of the cornerstone ABA biosynthetic gene VviNCED1, and the ABA transcriptional regulator VviABF1, were associated with the response of V. vinifera genotypes, while changes in VviNCED2 abundance were associated with the response of other Vitis genotypes. In contrast, the ABA RCAR receptors were not identified as key components of the genotypic variability of water-deficit responses. Interestingly, the expression of VviSnRK2.6 (an AtOST1 ortholog) was constitutively lower in roots and leaves of V. vinifera genotypes and higher in roots of V. berlandieri x V. rupestris hybrids. [br/] Conclusions: This study highlights that Vitis genotypes exhibiting different levels of drought adaptation differ in key steps involved in ABA metabolism and signalling; both under well-watered conditions and in response to water-deficit. In addition, it supports that adaptation may be related to various mechanisms related or not to ABA responses.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.subjectVitis Vinifera
dc.subjectGénotype
dc.subjectHybride
dc.subjectDéficit hydrique
dc.subjectVariation phénotypique
dc.subjectBiosynthèse
dc.subjectTranscription génétique
dc.subjectTranspiration végétale
dc.subjectTolérance à la sécheresse
dc.subjectExpression des gènes
dc.subjectStress hydrique
dc.subject.enAba Signalling
dc.subject.enWater-Deficit
dc.subject.enWater Potential
dc.subject.enTranspiration
dc.subject.enShoot
dc.subject.enRoots
dc.subject.enGrapevine
dc.subject.enGenotypic Variability
dc.subject.enAbscisic Acid
dc.title.enABA-mediated responses to water deficit separate grapevine genotypes by their genetic background
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12870-016-0778-4en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Biologie végétaleen_US
bordeaux.journalBMC Plant Biologyen_US
bordeaux.page15 p.en_US
bordeaux.volume16en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesEcophysiologie et Génomique Fonctionnelle de la Vigne (EGFV) - UMR 1287en_US
bordeaux.issue1en_US
bordeaux.institutionBordeaux Sciences Agroen_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-02523658
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2020-03-29T12:51:10Z
hal.exporttrue
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=BMC%20Plant%20Biology&rft.date=2016&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15%20p.&rft.epage=15%20p.&rft.eissn=1471-2229&rft.issn=1471-2229&rft.au=ROSSDEUTSCH,%20Landry&EDWARDS,%20Everard&COOKSON,%20Sarah%20Jane&BARRIEU,%20Francois&GAMBETTA,%20Gregory&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée