Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.rights.licenseopenen_US
dc.contributor.authorROUTHIER, F.
hal.structure.identifierBordeaux population health [BPH]
dc.contributor.authorDUCLOS, Noemie C.
IDREF: 188657371
dc.contributor.authorLACROIX, E.
dc.contributor.authorLETTRE, J.
dc.contributor.authorTURCOTTE, E.
dc.contributor.authorHAMEL, N.
dc.contributor.authorMICHAUD, F.
dc.contributor.authorDUCLOS, C.
dc.contributor.authorARCHAMBAULT, P. S.
dc.contributor.authorBOUYER, L. J.
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-15T14:38:30Z
dc.date.available2021-02-15T14:38:30Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203 (Electronic) 1932-6203 (Linking)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/26250
dc.description.abstractEnInertial measurement units (IMUs) have been increasingly popular in rehabilitation research. However, despite their accessibility and potential advantages, their uptake and acceptance by health professionals remain a big challenge. The development of an IMU-based clinical tool must bring together engineers, researchers and clinicians. This study is part of a developmental process with the investigation of clinicians’ perspectives about IMUs. Clinicians from four rehabilitation centers were invited to a 30-minute presentation on IMUs. Then, two one-hour focus groups were conducted with volunteer clinicians in each rehabilitation center on: 1) IMUs and their clinical usefulness, and 2) IMUs data analysis and visualization interface. Fifteen clinicians took part in the first focus groups. They expressed their thoughts on: 1) categories of variables that would be useful to measure with IMUs in clinical practice, and 2) desired characteristics of the IMUs. Twenty-three clinicians participated to the second focus groups, discussing: 1) functionalities, 2) display options, 3) clinical data reported and associated information, and 4) data collection duration. Potential influence of IMUs on clinical practice and added value were discussed in both focus groups. Clinicians expressed positive opinions about the use of IMUs, but their expectations were high before considering using IMUs in their practice.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectHACS
dc.title.enClinicians' perspectives on inertial measurement units in clinical practice
dc.title.alternativePLoS Oneen_US
dc.typeArticle de revueen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0241922en_US
dc.subject.halSciences du Vivant [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieen_US
dc.identifier.pubmed33186363en_US
bordeaux.journalPLoS ONEen_US
bordeaux.pagee0241922en_US
bordeaux.volume15en_US
bordeaux.hal.laboratoriesBordeaux Population Health Research Center (BPH) - U1219en_US
bordeaux.issue11en_US
bordeaux.institutionUniversité de Bordeauxen_US
bordeaux.teamHACSen_US
bordeaux.peerReviewedouien_US
bordeaux.inpressnonen_US
hal.identifierhal-03141856
hal.version1
hal.date.transferred2021-02-15T14:38:36Z
hal.exporttrue
bordeaux.COinSctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20ONE&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e0241922&rft.epage=e0241922&rft.eissn=1932-6203%20(Electronic)%201932-6203%20(Linking)&rft.issn=1932-6203%20(Electronic)%201932-6203%20(Linking)&rft.au=ROUTHIER,%20F.&DUCLOS,%20Noemie%20C.&LACROIX,%20E.&LETTRE,%20J.&TURCOTTE,%20E.&rft.genre=article


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée